A Hen in the Wind (1948)

Yasujirō Ozu | 1hr 24min

Looming large over the rundown homes of Tokiko’s village in Tokyo, an immense, round monolith of metal beams dominates the skyline. Unlike the smokestacks and factories which dot these urban outskirts, its purpose remains unclear – perhaps it is scaffolding for some postwar reconstruction, or maybe it is an abandoned industrial project. As far as Yasujirō Ozu is concerned, its function is not as important as the immense symbol of oppression it imposes upon those living in its shadow. It may fade into the background at times, blurred through his shallow focus, but it never disappears entirely from view. Even when Tokiko carries her ailing infant son Hiroshi through town streets, there it is right behind her, rising up in a low angle tracking shot as she desperately seeks help.

The year that neorealism peaked in Italy, Ozu was centring this hulking, industrial structure in his own examination of postwar poverty and its debilitation of the marginalised working class. There was no time to sit and mourn the great losses that were suffered from World War II – society simply needed to move on, leaving behind women like Tokiko whose enlisted husbands had not yet returned from war. Options are consequently limited for Tokiko, and as A Hen in the Wind sees her driven into a dire corner with rising inflation, Ozu offers nothing but incredible sympathy for the unfathomable choices she must make in extreme circumstances.

Ozu’s opening pillow shots introduce us to the giant, metal monolith that looms over this rundown town, using architecture as a statement of oppression and industrial progress.
Every sacrifice made in A Hen in the Wind is for the sake of the younger generations, hoping and striving for a better future.

“There’s an easier way for her to live,” Tokiko’s neighbour Orie slyly suggests one day, indirectly planting the idea of prostitution to pay for Hiroshi’s exorbitant hospital bills. It is telling that Ozu lines the bottom of the frame here with empty sake bottles, underscoring another set of struggles altogether within Orie’s home. She may be a minor character, but she is fully detailed in her short screen time, hinting at the nihilism which may similarly consume Tokiko in her reluctant turn to sex work. Hiroshi is all that matters, and as she examines her tired expression in the mirror, Ozu sombrely cuts between her face and its reflection. She knows what must be done, and in compromising moral dignity for an abiding love of her son, Kinuyo Tanaka’s performance manifests a tragic, pitiful sorrow.

Character neatly established through mise-en-scène, lining the bottom of the frame with bottles of sake.
Kinuyo Tanaka was one of Japan’s greatest actresses in the 1940s, yet she only collaborated with Ozu twice, particularly standing out here in this mirror shot. As we cut between her face and her reflection, we see her silently recognise the tragic sacrifice that must be made for her son.

Of course, Ozu would never be so explicit as to reveal Tokiko at her most compromised. A string of pillow shots transition into the shady local establishment where prostitutes meet their clients, settling on smoking ash trays, futons, and low-lit corridors, before meeting a group of patrons and staff playing mahjong. Their brief conversation fills in the gaps, revealing that Tokiko decided to only spend a single night working at this brothel, before Ozu poetically bookends the scene with identical pillow shots in reverse order.

Even with hard-hitting subject matter, Ozu chooses carefully what to keep offscreen, instead using pillow shots to reveal the dark, empty rooms of the local brothel.
Always present, and captured from endlessly refreshing angles. Ozu works wonders with this bizarre, alien structure all through the film.

Tokiko’s plea for her friend’s understanding cuts right to the heart of this undignifying dilemma, and through Ozu’s front-on camera placement, it virtually resonates as a plea to the viewer as well.

“If you were a woman with no money and your child got sick, what would you do? Where would you get the money for the hospital? What else can a woman do?”

The wait for her husband Shuichi’s return from war is made all the more agonising for this betrayal, overwhelming her with guilt as she speaks to his framed photo. Still, the shame felt upon his actual arrival may be even worse. From here, Ozu follows Shuichi’s tormented search for answers to his wife’s infidelity, hoping to find within himself the ability to forgive her. Visiting the brothel where she worked, he begins by finding some sympathy for a young prostitute whose elderly father and school-age brother financially rely upon her. With their conversation set against a view of distant cargo ships and industrial bridges, we are reminded of the harsh realities that consume these unlikely companions, yet which ultimately grants them a mutual understanding of each other’s difficult circumstances.

More than anything else in this era of Japanese society, shame and betrayal threatens the very foundation of Tokiko and Shuichi’s marriage.
Shuichi’s innocent bonding with a young prostitute is set against an industrial harbour, displaying the common circumstances that impact these vastly different characters.

The scraps of junk metal which dot this lookout not only serve to further underscore these poor conditions, but also become the subject of Ozu’s recurring pillow shots, handsomely framing backgrounds through hollow, rusted barrels. At a certain point, they even draw Shuichi’s focus as he wanders alone, pensively considering society’s abandoned litter alongside his own personal problems. A Hen in the Wind moves with him along this meditative journey, giving him that familiar low angle tracking shot which previously captured his wife and child against the monolith, and building out underlying formal patterns which echo particularly strongly at its climax.

Ozu brings incredible structure to his compositions, using metal pieces of junk to frame the background and reveal society’s postwar pollution.
Great formal strength in this pair of low angle tracking shots, alternately attached to Tokiko and Shuichi, and using the harsh local architecture as backdrops.

The initial setup arrives in a confrontation between the two when his heated questions completely shut her down. Frustrated by her refusal to speak, he throws a can down the stairs in a fit of anger, and Ozu momentarily departs from the scene with a cutaway to the ground floor where it eventually stops. Taken alone, this fleeting pause lets us grasp the pain which quietly lingers in the wake of Tokiko and Shuichi’s altercation, though its return in an even greater outburst also reveals it to be an accomplished piece of foreshadowing. As Tokiko ashamedly clings to him with profuse apologies, she is met with a callous shove that incidentally sends her tumbling down the stairs – and Ozu does not miss the chance to recall the exact same shot from earlier. In the silence which follows, she lies motionless in the same spot where the can once rested, crumpled and dehumanised by the comparison. Ozu very rarely uses physical violence in his films, but when he does it evidently carries the power to shatter entire worlds, fracturing the foundations of his characters’ humble lives.

One of Ozu’s finest moments as a formalist, lingering on this can falling down the stairs…
…and later revealing it to be a smart piece of foreshadowing as Tokiko suffers the same fate.

Yet somehow, even at Tokiko and Shuichi’s lowest, Ozu does not lose faith in the redemption of their souls. It takes a forced confrontation with the impact of his own behaviour for Shuichi to recognise where this cycle of resentment must end, and where healing between husband and wife must begin, putting each other’s transgressions behind them. Just as Japan must rebuild after the war, so too shall these aggrieved lovers piece together the remnants of their once-happy lives, finding whatever joy can survive beneath the shadow of that featureless monolith. There in the closing shots, children harmoniously play at its feet, and for the first time A Hen in the Wind reveals a fragile renewal lifting the historical weight of sacrifice, shame, and an entire generation’s moral compromise.

Children play in the shadow of the monolith, bringing life and joy to an otherwise sombre setting.

A Hen in the Wind is currently streaming on The Criterion Channel.

La Terra Trema (1948)

Luchino Visconti | 2hr 45min

The villagers of Aci Trezza do not speak Italian, La Terra Trema’s opening text is sure to inform us. Theirs is a Sicilian dialect which most people would have trouble comprehending, but Luchino Visconti is not interested in rounding off these rough edges for the sake of his mainland audience. His ensemble is made up of real townsfolk rather than professional actors after all, so why compromise on those details which give their insulated community such character and complexity? Moreover, why not use its rugged coastlines and bustling marketplaces in place of artificial studio sets, capturing their lives with even greater authenticity?

Visconti was not the only neorealist pushing these innovations forward in the 1940s, though where Vittorio de Sica and Roberto Rossellini used real locations to tell the stories of individuals, La Terra Trema leans into the story of its setting. The omniscient Italian voiceover which describes Aci Trezza’s daily routines and power structures does not compromise the naturalism on display – rather the opposite in fact, effectively shaping this literary adaptation into a work of docufiction which observes the village with a distant curiosity. It speaks in present tense, underscoring the spontaneity of each narrative development, but there is also no doubt regarding Visconti’s meticulous craftsmanship. This tale of one fisherman’s attempted revolution against the greedy local wholesalers is given an epic stage here, tracing the sort of rise-and-fall archetype that once belonged to Roman mythology, yet which Visconti transposes to a microcosm of modern Sicily.

Leading lines into the background, using blocking of actors to design the frame while remaining completely organic.
La Terra Trema is a family saga, and Visconti matches his visuals to the epic scope – not so much with vast landscapes than the sheer density of his crowded shots.

As is typical of these grand sagas as well, we find a family at the centre of its drama, rich with history and traditions which have thrived for generations. “The women always worry about the men at sea, as the family has always had a boat at sea, ever since the name Valastro has existed,” the narrator informs us, introducing the clan to whom our working-class hero Antonio belongs. Long have they been exploited by the wholesalers, but now that he has returned home from war, he has also brought with him radical new ideas. Uniting his fellow fishermen, he encourages them to resist budging on their prices, and ultimately claims victory despite the violence which breaks out. With the wholesalers temporarily out for the count, Antonio has the whole town on his side, yet this is only the beginning of his grand ambitions to reform Aci Trezza’s fishing industry.

Revolution among workers, using Eisenstein’s ‘monistic ensemble’ to transcend individualism.
Staggered blocking of the wholesalers’ faces in this frame – a wonderful composition imposing smug superiority.

It is no surprise that Visconti was commissioned by the Italian Communist Party to create this film, even if he diverged a little from their instructions to shoot a documentary. The product is ideologically akin to the Soviet Montage films of the 1920s, though formally the only significant influence here emerges from Sergei Eisenstein’s theory of the ‘monistic ensemble’, blocking large crowds as single units that transcend individualism. When it comes to the pure visual composition of bodies in the frames as well, few are Visconti’s equal. The full depth and scope of his frame are used to build out social hierarchies within the Valastro family and beyond, staggering actors in dynamic tableaux that seem to emerge organically from their weathered environments. Even when his camera is tracking through masses pulling boats ashore or haggling at the market, still these hundreds of people are staged with a piercing clarity, revealing the unity and tension which pervades everyday life in Aci Trezza.

Intricate staging within the Valastro home, distinguishing men, women, and children.
Masterful work with crowds, amplifying the scope of this saga.
Incredible complexity and desnity in Visconti’s composition, filling the frame with bodies in different poses as the Valastro family hits rock bottom.

Perhaps just as impactful in characterising these people are the textures of the village itself, its rough stonework worn to debris and rubble by decades of exposure to the elements. Upon walls tarnished by discoloured stains, we also occasionally find the hammer and sickle symbol, blatantly pointing to the rising Communist sentiment in the area. Despite the complex social structures which see military officers perversely leer over impoverished women, it is clear that no one here is truly wealthy. These people are trapped by their unfortunate circumstances, ravaged by a capitalist system which equates them to their economic value and condemns them to squalid living conditions.

Weathered textures framing Visconti’s actors, encompassing them in destitute poverty.
Much of this village has collapsed into debris and rubble, and Visconti’s location shooting does not shy away from exposing this side of Italy.
Communist symbols graffitied on walls, pointing to rising anticapitalist sentiments in the region.
Class and status depicted through height, with military officers often leering over the women of the town.

This is not to say that Aci Trezza lacks beauty, though its magnificence is entirely inseparable from the greyscale austerity of its land and seascapes. From the hours spent gazing longingly at the Mediterranean Sea and waiting for their men to return, the Valastro women may know this better than anyone too. Visconti’s low angles capture their black imprints against grey skies with great severity, their flapping cloaks giving the impression of crows as they brave the wind on the rugged headland. Jutting out of the water, craggy outcrops obstruct our view of the horizon, yet these also stand as familiar, welcoming landmarks to departing and returning sailboats. Meanwhile, high angles of the shoreline itself crowd the mise-en-scene with these wooden vessels resting between trips, blending in with the coarse sand and rock.

The Valastro women stand upon rocks in flapping, black cloaks like crows, gazing out at the sea – a masterfully bleak composition in this low angle.
Craggy outcrops beyond the shore interrupt the horizon, standing as familiar landmarks to sailors.
Rocky shorelines and wooden boats – Visconti loves setting these elemental textures against each other.

So bleak is this environment, it is difficult to see how Antonio’s success could ever be sustainable here. His dreams of becoming independent, buying a boat, and cutting the wholesalers out of the supply chain manifest through pure willpower and effort, yet still the narrator foreshadows an inevitable downfall. “Well, Antonio? You have everything. All you dreamed of is yours,” it sardonically reflects, moving beyond its once-detached tone. As much as we remain at a distance from these events, we can’t help but feel some resentment towards the cruel hand of fate which unleashes a destructive storm upon Antonio’s work, as well as the unforgiving capitalist system which kicks him while he’s down.

Antonio ostracised from his community, one man against the crowd.

Pressure mounts on the Valastro family when the bank comes to repossess their house, and soon even the town turns on them, effectively cutting Antonio’s sister Lucia off from any prospect of marriage. No longer is he a hero of the working class, but a reckless pariah who tried to enact change too quickly, and Visconti’s blocking continues to evolve with these new dynamics as the fisherman finds himself isolated among his own people. “One by one, the tree’s branches wither and fall,” the narrator laments, watching a once-respected clan collapse by the actions of one man who gambled their possessions away on a brighter future. Desperate and hungry, he returns to the smirking wholesalers in a moth-eaten shirt, and resigns himself to working under them once again as an underpaid labourer.

Antonio remains isolated even within his own fractured family.

It takes solidarity to spark revolution, and although it is this missing ingredient which sinks Antonio’s economic ambitions in La Terra Trema, the narrator does not lose hope in the slow wheel of progress. “No one will help him until they all learn to live and support each other,” it reflects, “and within himself he’ll find courage to start a new life.” Its impression of neutrality has faded, yet Visconti’s writing maintains a sincere conviction in the spirit of Aci Trezza – even if it continues to lie dormant beneath the cumbersome weight of inequality. For as long as these progressive ideals remain alive as a mere thought or feeling, human dignity endures in La Terra Trema, ingrained in the very fabric of a society sustained by its indispensable, tenacious working class.

A humiliating return to the status quo, meeting the wholesalers in a moth-eaten shirt and no bargaining power whatsoever.

La Terra Trema is currently streaming on Amazon Prime Video.

Port of Call (1948)

Ingmar Bergman | 1hr 40min

By the time Ingmar Bergman came around to directing his fifth feature film in 1948, Italy’s neorealist movement was in full, depressing swing, taking cameras to the streets of cities to capture the real struggles of ordinary people. Much like his previous works, romantic melodrama is the basis of Port of Call’s main storyline, and yet there is also an authentic grit here inspired by the Italians, wrestling with harsher realities of child abuse, abortion, and failed welfare services. In choosing to shoot on authentic docks and harbours, Bergman establishes his setting as a working-class port town, imbuing Berit’s troubles with a more nuanced sorrow connected to her helpless, abject poverty. As she stands on the edge of the water in the opening scene, ships, ropes, and steel beams form a harsh, industrial backdrop to her attempted suicide, offering little salvation in its cold visage besides the one kind sailor who dives in after her.

This first interaction between the two future lovers comes just at the right time for both. Where Berit was ready to give up on life, Gösta has recently returned from a long voyage and decided to settle down on the docks. A second chance encounter in a crowded dance hall pushes them even closer together, though building new relationships is not so easy when old ones continue to be the foundation of lingering trauma.

Flashbacks to those defining points of Berit’s childhood and adolescence are smoothly integrated throughout Port of Call, and are first brought in with a smooth match cut of her face dissolving into her younger self, lying awake in bed as her parents quarrel in the background. To them, she is simply a prop to be pulled back and forth in arguments with no regard for her perspective, and when she becomes a teenager, she is cruelly locked out of her own home for missing curfew. As a result, “I love you” is now an impossible phrase for her to speak, let alone understand.

“I hate those words. Everyone says them without meaning them.”

Bergman’s empathy towards his characters has been evident ever since his debut film, though the creative framing of close-ups which he employs here and would later turn into his visual trademark in the 1950s lands that sensitive compassion with even greater power and grace. Here, he often comes at the faces of his actors from oblique angles, tilting them away from the camera to catch their outline and nestling them against each other in bed, thereby crafting a beautiful intimacy between characters. Conversely, we often find him rupturing that tenderness with a terrible loneliness, using a splendid depth of field to reveal a disconnection amongst the girls in Berit’s reformation school, isolating her even further from an uncaring society.

Even beyond her past, there is a surprising cruelty in Gösta as well, who coldly spurns her upon learning of her previous relationships with other men. Like all of those, this does not seem to be a romance that will last, making the falsely optimistic note it ends feel particularly unearned. It is but an off note in an otherwise accomplished film for Bergman though, who at this point in his career is observing and learning from his fellow contemporary filmmakers. As well as the neorealist influence that sees him bring backgrounds to life with the action of moving cranes, the occasional montage of ships and docks between scenes feels slightly reminiscent of Yasujiro Ozu’s characteristic pillow shots, building a rhythm in transitions that offer a soothing quietude. Sailors and labourers may fill this port with bustling activity, yet the isolation of Bergman’s characters frequently overrides that liveliness, setting in a bleak tone that sees old traumas surface and threaten the chance for new beginnings.

Port of Call is currently streaming on The Criterion Channel.

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948)

John Huston | 2hr 6min

At times it feels as if every post-1940s representation of greed on film in some way comes back to that immortal figure of madness at the centre of The Treasure of the Sierra Madre. The image of Fred C. Dobbs talking to himself as he spirals into a whirlwind of paranoia bleeds into the characterisation of Gollum from The Lord of the Rings and Spike Lee’s screenplay for Da 5 Bloods. John Huston’s writing of a potentially great man whose hollow pursuit of riches leaves him with a corrupt, rotten soul also manifests in the arc of Jordan Belfort from The Wolf of Wall Street, as well as Daniel Plainview in There Will Be Blood. There is something distinct about Dobbs’ treachery though, especially with it being so rooted in Western genre archetypes that form part of a greater narrative about humanity’s attempts to tame wild, natural lands beyond their control.

The adventure and shooting typically found in other films of this genre is not entirely missing here, though it does play a secondary role to the drama unfolding among the three American prospectors traversing Mexican mountainsides, and their conflicts with the locals. They do not belong in these parts, but the older ex-miner Howard possesses a little bit more experience, providing sage counsel and wisdom in their endeavours. “I know what gold does to men’s souls,” he warns ominously, and Huston thus sets in motion a cautionary tale that turns the weak-willed Dobbs into a mistrustful, insatiable, and vindictive creature, prepared to kill his friends in anticipation of their betrayal, as well as to enact his own. As he lays down behind the campfire with a haunted, wide-eyed expression, the flames continue to flicker up higher and higher, roasting him in a hellish image of spiritual damnation.

A striking, hellish image as Dobbs descends deeper into his madness.
There is a solid argument for this as Bogart’s single greatest performance, and one of the best of the 1940s.

With such magnificent direction backing it up, The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is hugely significant in solidifying Huston’s status as an all-time great filmmaker, though it is just as much a major achievement for Humphrey Bogart who steps far outside the realm of hardboiled detective roles to deliver a ground-breaking performance of pure insanity. He is in full command of his rambling monologues, many of which are directed to no one but himself, and in close-ups Huston sticks us with his sweaty, tanned face, at times twisted in wicked, cackling expressions. In the darkness Dobbs appears as a truly formidable figure, though in the broad light of day Huston’s superb use of deep focus cinematography and open, natural spaces allows some remarkable formations in the blocking of his actors, painting out this web of thorny relationships in great detail.

Magnificent blocking integral to Huston’s visual storytelling.

Perhaps the most important element of Huston’s staging is the framing of Dobbs and his companions against these graceful yet imposing mountains, wearing them down with bandits, deadly animals, and collapsing goldmines. Even as Dobbs digs deeper into his delusion, there remains an organic, circular flow to this environment. While the younger prospectors don’t dwell too long on the damage they have caused, Howard recognises the need to respect to the ecosystem he has plundered by closing up the “wounds” he has made in it.

Staggering actors through the foreground and background, making use of the landscape’s natural terrain.

Even then though, there remains a strange, auspicious mysticism in the earth’s efforts to claim back that which was taken from it. Friends and strangers alike murder each other to claim ownership over those tiny grains of gold extracted from the mountainside, and yet all their self-centred efforts are so quickly undercut by the simple winds of fate blowing in from across the ranges. “The gold has gone back to where we found it,” Howard roars with laughter, recognising in equal awe and amusement the absurd joke that the universe has played on them. Not everyone gets off so lightly, especially as Dobbs finds himself cowering beneath the lethal blows of bandits who send him to an end fitting of his obsessive mistrust. In this way, poetic justice finds its way home in each of Huston’s character arcs, orchestrated by some omnipresent force of nature that gives and takes in cyclical motions, ultimately carrying The Treasure of the Sierra Madre through to an end that leaves almost everyone no better or worse off than before – minus those individuals who tried and failed to exploit the earth’s resources in order to build self-serving worlds of delusion and greed.

Dobbs’ fate catching up with him, revealed in a single haunting reflection.

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is available to rent or buy on iTunes, YouTube, and Google Play.

The Red Shoes (1948)

Michael Powell | 2hr 14min

When the much-touted Ballet of the Red Shoes finally opens for Ballet Lermontov, Michael Powell sets us a good distance back in the audience to watch the majestic red curtains slowly part. For a brief moment we might believe we are going to watch a small excerpt of this adaptation of the Hans Christian Anderson fairy tale play out from this angle, perhaps before fading into the bows, or the audience reaction afterwards. What we get instead is a 17-minute sequence of musical, cinematic bliss that may lay honest claim to the greatest demonstration of Technicolor on film in the 1940s. 
  
As the stage disappears, we are immersed in a vibrant, expressionist world that towers far taller than any regular theatre ceiling. The camera moves with vigour, following the young heroine as she dances through elaborate, layered compositions of carnivals, oceans, clifftops, and undefined, surreal nightmares. Forcing her to keep moving along are her magical red shoes, sold to her by a mysterious street peddler, whose long, daunting shadow later clutches at her when she tries to rid herself of the curse and return home. Canted angles, montages, visual effects which teleport the young woman from one setting to the next – Powell is throwing his full arsenal of stylistic techniques at this ballet, pulling us into the mind of both the bewitched young heroine and the woman who plays her, Vicky. Acting out this heightened, fantastical microcosm of reality, Vicky imagines the two opposing forces in her character’s life as the most important men in her own, marvellously super-imposed over their counterparts.

The proscenium arch disappears as Powell lets these expressionist, theatrical sets become an entire world.
Inexorable ambition, both in Vicky and the character she plays in The Ballet of the Red Shoes.
Still in the early days of Technicolor film, Powell was crafting all-time wonderful images such as these.
The challenge here is choosing only a few images to lift from this breath-taking 17-minute dance sequence, which disappears into boundless imagination.

This extended, wordless interlude splits the film into two halves, the first of which follows Vicky and her musical collaborator, Julian, along two intertwining paths of ambition. At first they circle each other in theatres and rehearsal rooms, and then over time their innocent interactions evolve into a kind, tender love. They are still set on their careers, but the sharp words of their strict mentor, Boris Lermontov, hang over Vicky’s head as she falls prey to her romantic desires. 

“The dancer who relies on the doubtful comforts of human love will never be a great dancer.” 

Regardless of whether this is universally true, Lermontov creates a self-fulfilling prophecy merely in speaking these words, forcing a gut-wrenching choice upon Vicky. By invoking the Red Shoes in his final temptation, he comes to personify them, setting in motion the same downfall as that suffered by her character. Powell often bridges scenes with elegant long dissolves, and after one particularly warm embrace between Vicky and Julian he uses such a fade to impose the next shot of Lermontov over the top, shattering the romance with his threatening presence. 

It’s not just Powell’s colours that astound, but also his long dissolves working to combine images as we see here.

Beyond the stage, Powell’s displays of rich colour and theatrical lighting make their way into offices, dressing rooms, and rehearsal spaces, surrounding our three leads in a world of spectacle. There is detail in the arrangement of hues as tiny as the fruits which lay across Lermontov’s desk upon his first meeting with Julian, and then on the corner of the table, our eyes are drawn to a vivid flourish of orange flowers. From here, blossoms continue to adorn almost every interior in this film, with the full spectrum of coloured petals growing in number as Vicky finds more success in her pursuit of greatness. 

From Julian and Boris’ first meeting…
…to Victoria’s final show. Flowers are everywhere, always vibrant in their multi-coloured beauty.
Matching costumes to the surrounding décor, 16 years before Jacques Demy would make it part of his stylistic repertoire in The Umbrellas of Cherbourg.

As for her internal struggle between lifestyles, Powell chooses to represent this with red and white patterns, splashing these colours of passion and tranquillity across her wide-eyed, sweaty face and lavish costumes. I don’t believe it is a coincidence that the same scheme is used to similar effect in Black Narcissus, or that these are two of the best displays of Technicolor in Powell’s career. His control over these very specific palettes all through The Red Shoes goes beyond the crafting of immaculate compositions, as it furthermore binds us so tightly to Vicky’s mental state, that we can’t help but be plunged right into the psychological depths of her pure, self-destructive ambition.

A pair of images from Black Narcissus and The Red Shoes, Powell returning to his red and white colour palette in makeup and costume as a reflection of passion and purity.
A gorgeous melding of blocking, architecture, and colours in this stunning composition.

The Red Shoes is available to stream on SBS On Demand and The Criterion Channel, and available to rent or buy on iTunes.