City of Women (1980)

Federico Fellini | 2hr 19min

The outlandish matriarchal society that middle-aged philanderer Snàporaz wanders through in City of Women is not quite the grand feminist statement that one might expect, but rather a self-deprecating cinematic tool for Federico Fellini to pick at his own masculine insecurities. The women who occupy this secluded region of Italy are militant caricatures, calling the missionary position a “sociocultural oppression” and claiming wrinkles are a male invention, though they are specifically the type of radicals that one might invent as a straw man for the sake of ridicule and derision. As Fellini reveals in its closing scene, they are little more than figments of Snàporaz’s unconscious mind as he naps on a long-distance train journey, pieced together from real women travelling with him in true The Wizard of Oz-style.

Still, every so often, a sharp blade of truth slices through Snàporaz’s uneasy fantasy. He has smirked at and talked down to the attendees of the feminist convention that he has stumbled across, but he can only remain hidden in the crowd for so long. The speaker to draw him into the spotlight is the woman who he followed into this mysterious city, and now as she addresses her audience, she eloquently raises him upon a pedestal of judgement.

“Our efforts here have been useless, sisters. The eyes of that man, presently among us with that look of feigned respectability, of one who desires to know us, understand us because he insists it can better our relationship. We are only a pretext for another of his crude animalistic fables. Another neurotic song and dance act. We’re his chorus, his hula hula girls, his fiends. We enhance his show with our passion, with our suffering.”

If Marcello Mastroianni is once again performing the role of Fellini’s surrogate here, then it is plain to see the self-criticism in this passage. As a filmmaker, he recognises his own tendency towards the objectifying male gaze, while as a husband, the guilt of his affairs weighs enormously on his conscience. Only someone who has been inside his mind could design a nightmare so specifically targeted to these doubts, and only Fellini could do so with the edge of dark, chaotic surrealism present in Snàporaz’s emasculating journey through City of Women.

The visual magnificence which once guided us through the absurd dreamscapes of Satyricon and Casanova is far more inconsistent here than we are used to with Fellini, though his most familiar stylistic trademarks still make an impact. The zooming, panning, and drifting camera movements through crowds of people are stifling, while imposing set designs totally consume Snàporaz, defining each episode in this narrative with renewed visions of Kafkaesque madness and self-reflection. As he slowly descends a giant slide in a lonely amusement park, he watches memories of his childhood crushes pass by in strange exhibitions, and in a miserable, grey courtyard of portraits and candles he finds himself speechless before a panel of female judges.

The manor of Dr. Xavier Katzone where Snàporaz seeks refuge is the set piece where Fellini’s absurd spectacle lifts off though, encompassing the bewildered outsider in an eclectic mix of patterns, textiles, and phallic sculptures. Even the spires on the fence outside were designed with that resemblance in mind, the doctor explains, consciously rebelling against his matriarchal rulers. Among the more peculiar displays here too is the long, arched corridor lined with photos of every woman he has slept with, each individually lighting up and playing explicit audio of their encounters.

In effect, Snàporaz’s vanity takes physical form in Dr. Katzone, whose manor is essentially a shrine dedicated to himself. True to his ostentatious arrogance, the doctor even hosts a celebration of his ten thousandth sexual conquest that evening, complete with a giant cake and enough candles to burn down the entire building. Fellini continues ramping up the absurdity through this sequence, lingering on one guest’s party trick of sucking up coins into her vagina aided by some reverse photography, but once again the insanity comes to a halt when Snàporaz comes face-to-face with his own shortcomings – this time manifesting as his ex-wife, Elena. The bitterness in their quarrel is only drowned by a shared sorrow over their festered love, as she leaves him to wonder whether there may be some possibility of redemption in his future.

“There may still be a chance, if you wanted. Or are we too old to be young again, you and I?”

Perhaps this is why when Snàporaz is eventually put on trial for his masculinity and dismissed to go free, he nevertheless chooses to face his mysterious punishment anyway, following a corridor into a boxing ring with a giant, stone tower in the centre. “Shake her, break her, find her, lose her, open her, close her, love her, kill her, remember her, forget her,” the crowd of women chant, encouraging him to climb it and make love to the supposedly ideal woman at the top. Halfway up the ladder though, he is not so certain that this is necessarily what he desires.

“If you existed, would you be my reward or punishment? Please, let me go. Have mercy. Get me out of this mess. What good am I to you? I don’t need you, and vice versa. Could it be we’ve already met but that I don’t recognise you? My first love? No, you must be somebody new, someone born out me.”

At the top he finds only Donatella, the sole woman to have shown him kindness in this city, and a hot air balloon that has taken her form. Perhaps this is his escape then, Snàporaz half-correctly presumes, before she loads a machine gun and sends him plummeting to his death.

Back on the train, he jolts awake. “You’ve been mumbling and moaning for two hours,” the woman he previously followed off elucidates. The reveal would almost seem like a copout if the seeds of this journey were not so evidently planted within Snàporaz’s subconscious, sprouting into deliberations that he may either disregard as pesky nightmares or carry with him into the real world. As the train hurtles into a tunnel though, Mastroianni does not grant such clear answers, leaving us with an expression that could be either peaceful acceptance or smug complacency. Clearly the layers of insecurity and madness which City of Women is founded upon are slippery for any man as conceited as Snàporaz or even Fellini himself to grasp, composing an imperfect yet compelling portrait of masculinity threatened only by its haughty, self-destructive hubris.

City of Women can be purchased on Amazon.

The Earrings of Madame de… (1953)

Max Ophüls | 1hr 45min

French noblewoman Louise regularly visits the local Catholic church in The Earrings of Madame de… to pray for prosperity, though the tenets of her faith do not fall in so neatly with the Christian doctrine of 19th century Europe. The intended recipient of her invocations is not necessarily God, but rather a fatalistic universe which has already miraculously proven itself to be on her side, whether by chance or providence. As for the sacred charm which she venerates as an icon of good fortune, one needs to look no further than those precious diamond earrings which she had previously tried to part with to pay off her enormous debts, and yet have since returned through pure happenstance. This of course can’t just be coincidence, she decides, and thus these pieces of jewellery are imbued with a mystical sentimentality that she alone has conceived of in her mind.

If destiny does exist within The Earrings of Madame de… though, then it isn’t one that can be influenced simply through prayers, wishes, or talismans. It is cold and indifferent, guaranteeing that whether it is Louise’s husband André or her paramour Fabrizio who ultimately wins their contest, she will be left heartbroken by the loss of the other. Max Ophüls may have been German-born, and yet these lyrical contemplations of fate’s ironic passages position him as perhaps the greatest inheritor of France’s poetic realism in the 1950s. Moreover, this lofty status is only strengthened by his use of Jean Renoir’s favoured cinematographer Christian Matras, crafting long, elegant tracking shots that carry the legacy of his cinematic forefathers.

Exquisite use of frames all throughout the film, wrapping characters up in ornately designed mirrors and trapping them behind windows.

There are few visual devices that match so gracefully to the film’s predeterministic perspective as this, seeing the camera trace the winding paths of objects and people before settling on extraordinary frames that Ophüls has perfectly arranged as the camera’s destination. Right from the very first shot, he is already laying the groundwork for this overarching aesthetic in a 2-and-a-half minute long take that begins on those fateful earrings, follows the movement of Louise’s hands through dressers and armoires, and finally catches her reflection trying them on in a small, oval mirror. As a result, she is immediately introduced as a woman defined by her abundantly lavish possessions rather than her innate qualities or relationships.

Ophüls opens his film with a masterful tracking shot that starts on the titular earrings, before following Louise’s hands through her wardrobe and dresser, and eventually revealing her face in a mirror.

Ophüls is not one to cut corners on his production design either, consuming Louise in a cluttered opulence that evokes Josef von Sternberg’s busy mise-en-scène, yet without the harsh angles of his expressionism. Hanging around the edges of her bed are thin gauze drapes patterned with floral emblems, often framing her face or lightly obscuring it as the camera peers into her intimate domain, while elsewhere dining tables laden with candelabras, glassware, and bottles obstruct our view from low camera angles. Behind the seated guests, a giant mirror stretching the length of the wall turns the ballroom dancers into a lively backdrop, surrounding Louise with upper-class splendour on every side. Even when she grows depressed, she remains totally consumed by this material lifestyle, as Ophüls sinks her body into a large armchair that leaves only her head visible at the bottom of the frame. Just as exorbitant wealth incites Louise’s romantic interest, so too does it stifle relationships, including her marriage to André whose large bed sits in the same room far away from her own. Though she has taken his surname, Ophüls underscores its complete irrelevance to her identity all throughout The Earrings of Madame de…, frequently censoring it with diegetic interruptions and convenient camera placements.

Hanging around the edges of Louise’s bed are thin gauze drapes patterned with floral emblems, often framing her face or lightly obscuring it as the camera peers into her intimate domain.
Behind the seated guests at the ball, a giant mirror stretching the length of the wall, turning the ballroom dancers into a lively backdrop and surrounding Louise with upper-class splendour on every side.
When Louise grows depressed, she remains totally consumed by her material lifestyle, as Ophüls sinks her body into a large armchair that leaves only her head visible at the bottom of the frame.

That the earrings which Louise decides to sell were a wedding gift from André speaks even more to her disinterest in their marriage, motivating her pretend to lose them during a night out at the theatre, before actually pawning them off to local jeweller Mr Rémy. At least her husband returns the sentiment, or lack thereof, as once Mr Rémy secretly sells them back to him, he presents them as a farewell gift to his mistress Lola before she leaves for Constantinople. During her travels, they are again used to pay off personal debts, winding up in the hands of another jeweller who in turn sells them to a passing traveller – handsome middle-aged gentleman, Fabrizio. That he should later run into Louise twice in the span of two weeks and eventually fall in love with her seems too strange of a coincidence, and when he unassumingly gifts her the earrings that she once owned, she too recognises the remarkable journey they took to return home.

The earrings travel from Paris to Constantinople and back again, passing through the hands of multiple strangers yet always being guided by fate.

Within this web of affairs though, André is no fool. He indulges Louise’s pretence of losing her treasured earrings for some time despite knowing the truth through Mr Rémy, and his observations of her apparently platonic relationship with Fabrizio stoke suspicions. From his position of power and knowledge, he maliciously toys with her, and even forces her to give the earrings to his niece who has recently given birth. Quite remarkably though, Ophüls sees them sold to cover debts for a third time in his narrative, and thus Louise is given the chance to buy them back from Rémy much to her husband’s dismay. After all, no longer do they represent their matrimonial union, but rather her relationship with Fabrizio which has reliably conquered the stacked odds against it.

With Ophüls’ dextrous camera manoeuvring the ups and downs of this affair, it isn’t hard to fall prey to Louise’s romantic idealism either. The coordination of his cranes and dollies through scenes with multiple actors become a delicate dance of blocking – quite literally too in a montage that breezes through several weeks of illicit encounters at balls. As Louise and Fabrizio waltz through large crowds, the camera delicately weaves with them, drifting further and closer to their quiet conversations in rhythmic patterns. With each individual dalliance being linked by long dissolves, Ophüls creates the impression of one long, uninterrupted dance, blissfully contained inside a dream that Louise will keep prolonging for as long as destiny wills it to live.

A splendid montage of long dissolves weaving together multiple meetings between lovers, each time with the camera freely tracking their movements across the ballroom.

As far is Louise is concerned though, this is barely an obstacle. “Will we meet again?” Fabrizio asks on their second chance run-in, to which she replies with absolute confidence, “Fate is on our side.” Of course, this faith rests on flimsy foundations, imbuing material objects with arbitrary meaning in much the same way her friend applies clairvoyant readings to ordinary cards. Ophüls’ formal construction of this character through multiple belief systems is impeccable, eventually rolling them into one when she returns to the shrine of St. Genevieve in the closing minutes of the film, and leaves behind her earrings as an offering to whichever God may be listening.

Louise is a woman who relies on multiple belief systems, twice visiting the church to pray for good fortune, and giving Ophüls a solid excuse to return to this marvellous composition.
Ophüls is an early adopter of canted angles, subtly throwing the mise-en-scène off-balance as the drama winds out of control.

Is it fate then which coincides Fabrizio’s death with her relinquishing of these jewels, or was this merely the random winds of chance delivering a long overdue tragedy to a woman who has never known true heartbreak? Perhaps this vast, erratic cosmos does not care so much for the life of any one individual after all, with the only meaning in it being imprinted by those actively seeking out patterns. Imposing formal structure upon chaos may very well be Ophüls’ job too as a storyteller, but in what is likely the strongest shot of The Earrings of Madame de… he also recognises the human soul’s slow fade into insignificance with romantic poignancy, watching the scattered shreds of a torn-up love letter blow out a train window and join a flurry of snow. Just as it is impossible to find any meaningful configuration in their singular paths, their destinations are similarly unknowable, and yet to follow their journey upon gusts and breezes in this beautiful, fleeting moment is to truly comprehend the inscrutability of life’s unpredictable paths.

An astounding transition from pieces of a ripped-up letter to falling snow, blowing in the wind along unknowable paths.

The Earrings of Madame de… is streaming on The Criterion Channel and is available to purchase from Amazon.

An Inexhaustive Catalogue of Auteur Trilogies

There is a formal poetry to film trilogies which, when in the hands of an auteur, can reveal new dimensions to cinematic, narrative, and thematic interests not fully contained within their individual works. Sometimes this is as simple as the direct continuation of a story, with the three-part structure best serving epics like Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings. They do not always need to share characters or plotlines between films though, but may simply carry a common idea, such as the variations of spiritual belief and doubt that Ingmar Bergman explores in his Faith trilogy.

The trilogies listed here are in chronological order, based on the release of their first instalment. Not all of them are consistently made up of great films, but they are worth documenting nonetheless. To qualify for this list, a series of films must be:

1. contained to exactly three films.

For instance, this excludes the original trilogies of The Matrix, Mad Max, and Indiana Jones, since their directors continued to expand them into longer series. However, this rule does not exclude trilogies that were turned into larger franchises by other directors, such as Steven Soderbergh’s Ocean’s trilogy.

2. made by a single director or co-directors, preferably of auteur status.

This excludes the Star Wars original trilogy for example, since George Lucas stepped down from the role of director for The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi. It does however include his prequel trilogy.

3. connected by a story, a character, a setting, or an idea.

This is the loosest rule, but a crucial one. What defines a trilogy is largely determined by the director and their individual fascinations, even if they retroactively decide the films to be part of a series.

Fritz Lang’s Dr. Mabuse trilogy

FilmYear
Dr. Mabuse, the Gambler1922
The Testament of Dr. Mabuse1933
The Thousand Eyes of Dr. Mabuse1960

Vsevolod Pudovkin’s Revolutionary trilogy

FilmYear
Mother1926
The End of St. Petersburg1927
Storm over Asia1928

Roberto Rossellini’s War trilogy

FilmYear
Rome, Open City1945
Paisan1946
Germany, Year Zero1948

John Ford’s Calvary trilogy

FilmYear
Fort Apache1948
She Wore a Yellow Ribbon1949
Rio Grande1950

Yasujirō Ozu’s Noriko trilogy

FilmYear
Late Spring1949
Early Summer1951
Tokyo Story1953
Tokyo Story (1953).

Federico Fellini’s Loneliness trilogy

FilmYear
La Strada1954
Il Bidone1955
Nights of Cabiria1957

Satyajit Ray’s Apu trilogy

FilmYear
Pather Panchali1955
Aparajito1956
Apur Sansar1959

Masaki Kobayashi’s The Human Condition trilogy

FilmYear
The Human Condition I: No Greater Love1959
The Human Condition II: Road to Eternity1959
The Human Condition III: A Soldier’s Prayer1961
The Human Condition I: No Greater Love (1959)

Michelangelo Antonioni’s Trilogy on Modernity and its Discontents

FilmYear
L’Avventura1960
La Notte1961
L’Eclisse1962

Ingmar Bergman’s Faith trilogy

FilmYear
Through a Glass Darkly1961
Winter Light1963
The Silence1963

Sergio Leone’s Dollars trilogy

FilmYear
A Fistful of Dollars1964
For a Few Dollars More1965
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly1966
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (1966)

Roman Polanski’s Apartment trilogy

FilmYear
Repulsion1965
Rosemary’s Baby1968
The Tenant1976

Sergio Corbucci’s Mud and Blood trilogy

FilmYear
Django1966
The Great Silence1968
The Specialists1969

Lindsay Anderson’s Mick Travis trilogy

FilmYear
If….1968
O Lucky Man!1973
Britannia Hospital1982

Luchino Visconti’s Germany trilogy

FilmYear
The Damned1969
Death in Venice1971
Ludwig1973
The Damned (1969)

Pier Paolo Pasolini’s Trilogy of Life

FilmYear
The Decameron1971
The Canterbury Tales1972
Arabian Nights1974

Alan J. Pakula’s Paranoia trilogy

FilmYear
Klute1971
The Parallax View1974
All the President’s Men1976

Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfather trilogy

FilmYear
The Godfather1972
The Godfather: Part II1974
The Godfather: Part III1990

Wim Wender’s Road Movie trilogy

FilmYear
Alice in the Cities1974
The Wrong Move1975
Kings of the Road1976

Terry Jones’ Monty Python trilogy

FilmYear
Monty Python and the Holy Grail1975
Monty Python’s Life of Brian1979
Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life1983

Dario Argento’s Three Mothers trilogy

FilmYear
Suspiria1977
Inferno1980
The Mother of Tears2007
Suspiria (1977)

Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s BRD trilogy

FilmYear
The Marriage of Maria Braun1979
Lola1981
Veronika Voss1982

Terry Gilliam’s Imagination trilogy

FilmYear
Time Bandits1981
Brazil1985
The Adventures of Baron Munchausen1988

Sam Raimi’s Evil Dead trilogy

FilmYear
The Evil Dead1981
Evil Dead II1987
Army of Darkness1993
Evil Dead II (1987)

Theo Angelopoulos’ Trilogy of Silence

FilmYear
Voyage to Cythera1983
The Beekeeper1986
Landscape in the Mist1988

Lars von Trier’s Europa trilogy

FilmYear
The Element of Crime1984
Epidemic1987
Europa1991

Robert Zemeckis’ Back to the Future trilogy

FilmYear
Back to the Future1985
Back to the Future Part II1989
Back to the Future Part III1990

Bernardo Bertolucci’s Oriental trilogy

FilmYear
The Last Emperor1987
The Sheltering Sky1990
Little Buddha1993

Michael Haneke’s Glaciation trilogy

FilmYear
The Seventh Continent1989
Benny’s Video1992
71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance1994

Wong Kar-wai’s Love trilogy

FilmYear
Days of Being Wild1990
In the Mood for Love2000
20462004
In the Mood for Love (2000)

Baz Luhrmann’s Red Curtain trilogy

FilmYear
Strictly Ballroom1992
Romeo + Juliet1996
Moulin Rouge!2001

Robert Rodriguez’s Mexico trilogy

FilmYear
El Mariachi1992
Desperado1995
Once Upon a Time in Mexico2003

Krzysztof Kieślowski’s Three Colours trilogy

FilmYear
Three Colours: Blue1993
Three Colours: White1994
Three Colours: Red1994
Three Colours: Blue (1993)

Richard Linklater’s Before trilogy

FilmYear
Before Sunrise1995
Before Sunset2004
Before Midnight2013

Lars von Trier’s Golden Heart trilogy

FilmYear
Breaking the Waves1996
The Idiots1998
Dancer in the Dark2000

Nicolas Winding Refn’s Pusher trilogy

FilmYear
Pusher1996
Pusher II2004
Pusher 32005
Pusher II (2004)

George Lucas’ Star Wars prequel trilogy

FilmYear
Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace1999
Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones2002
Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith2005

Alejandro Iñárritu’s Death trilogy

FilmYear
Amores Perros2000
21 Grams2003
Babel2006

Roy Andersson’s Living trilogy

FilmYear
Songs from the Second Floor2000
You, the Living2007
A Pigeon Sat on a Branch Reflecting on Existence2014

M. Night Shyamalan’s Unbreakable trilogy

FilmYear
Unbreakable2000
Split2016
Glass2019
Songs from the Second Floor (2000)

Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings trilogy

FilmYear
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring2001
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers2002
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King2003

Steven Soderbergh’s Ocean’s trilogy

FilmYear
Ocean’s Eleven2001
Ocean’s Twelve2004
Ocean’s Thirteen2007

Andrew Lau and Alan Mak’s Infernal Affairs trilogy

FilmYear
Infernal Affairs2002
Infernal Affairs II2003
Infernal Affairs III2003
Infernal Affairs (2002)

Park Chan-wook’s Vengeance trilogy

FilmYear
Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance2002
Oldboy2003
Lady Vengeance2005

Gus van Sant’s Death trilogy

FilmYear
Gerry2002
Elephant2003
Last Days2005

Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man trilogy

FilmYear
Spider-Man2002
Spider-Man 22004
Spider-Man 32007
Spider-Man 2 (2004)

Edgar Wright’s Cornetto trilogy

FilmYear
Shaun of the Dead2004
Hot Fuzz2007
The World’s End2013

Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight trilogy

FilmYear
Batman Begins2005
The Dark Knight2008
The Dark Knight Rises2012

Joachim Trier’s Oslo trilogy

FilmYear
Reprise2006
Oslo, August 31st2011
The Worst Person in the World2021
Oslo, August 31st (2011)

Lars von Trier’s Depression trilogy

FilmYear
Antichrist2009
Melancholia2011
Nymphomaniac2014

Luca Guadagnino’s Desire trilogy

FilmYear
I Am Love2009
A Bigger Splash2015
Call Me By Your Name2017

Tomm Moore’s Irish Folklore trilogy

FilmYear
The Secret of Kells2009
Song of the Sea2014
Wolfwalkers2020

Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit trilogy

FilmYear
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey2012
The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug2013
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies2014
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012)

Terrence Malick’s Weightless trilogy

FilmYear
To the Wonder2012
Knight of Cups2015
Song to Song2017

Adam McKay’s Freakout trilogy

FilmYear
The Big Short2015
Vice2018
Don’t Look Up2021

Paul Schrader’s Man in a Room trilogy

FilmYear
First Reformed2017
The Card Counter2021
Master Gardener2022

Kenneth Branagh’s Hercule Poirot trilogy

FilmYear
Murder on the Orient Express2017
Death on the Nile2022
A Haunting in Venice2023

Ti West’s X trilogy

FilmYear
X2022
Pearl2022
MaXXXine2024
Pearl (2022)

The Bikeriders (2023)

Jeff Nichols | 1hr 56min

Girl-next-door Kathy Bauer was simply not meant for a life of marriage to a gangster, and as one of the few voices of reason in The Bikeriders, it is apparent that she was never going to shed her outsider status. Still, her wide-eyed innocence is no match for Benny’s rugged good looks, cool swagger, and romantic persistence, seeing him patiently wait outside her house all night until her boyfriend packs up and leaves out of frustration. The peril that comes with his membership in the Vandals Motorcycle Club is inconsequential – he is the type of man she never believed she would date, yet who has somehow tapped into a deep, primal lust for danger.

At first glance, it appears that this is Jeff Nichols’ take on an S.E. Hinton novel, exploring the nuances of 1960s greaser subculture with equal parts sensitivity and scepticism. Theirs is a community that looks out for its own people, fostering a rare kind of male bonding that cannot be found in mainstream society, even as they put up tough facades. The framing device which keeps returning to photojournalist Danny Lyon’s interviews lends itself far more to distant rumination than immersion though, and covers a greater span of time than Hinton’s coming-of-age stories. These are not teenagers railing against a conservative older generation, but adults realising that their glory days are slowly seeping away, while younger gangsters emerging in the scene threaten to push them out.

If that wasn’t enough to separate The Bikeriders from Hinton’s work, then the busy Chicago setting takes this story far away from the small-town decay of Tulsa, Oklahoma, being notably marked by an array of glaring vocal transformations. While Austin Butler slips easily into a Midwestern dialect and Tom Hardy mumbles his way through a nasally Marlon Brando impression, Jodie Comer fully adopts a Fargo-style accent, imitating the real Kathy from the historic photobook upon which the film is based. Her role as narrator across eight years of a tumultuous marriage fully justifies this daring commitment – in those stretches where she is present only through voiceover, it is evident that she is a misfit among misfits.

It would take someone who has never seen Goodfellas to miss the endless allusions to Martin Scorsese’s gangster epic here, with this narration being just the first of many. When we are first introduced to Benny in a brawl, the freeze frame which lands half a second before a shovel strikes the back of his head heavily evokes our first meeting with Henry Hill, and our sudden launch into a pop-rock soundtrack and voiceover only confirms the parallel. Following a jump back to the early days of Kathy and Benny’s relationship, the camera floats around a hazy bar as she lists the names of his biker friends, before the narrative eventually catches back up to the opening scene and reveals its dangerous consequences.

That The Bikeriders treads dangerously close to being derivative of a far greater influence is no reason to disregard what is otherwise an admirable film though, standing well on its own merits. Nichols shows flashes of visual inspiration around the motorcycles themselves, turning them into icons of liberation cruising along in slow-motion and piercing the darkness with bleary headlights, while the patterned period décor of Kathy’s home frequently grounds us in a far humbler, more ordinary life. The cast he gathers here including Michael Shannon and Norman Reedus also fills out the ensemble with magnetic personalities, building a lively community within the Vandals that will inevitably fall to its own recklessness.

For some members, the end arrives with a devastating motorcycle accident, while Kathy’s patience runs out after a harrowing sexual assault at a party. Most of all though, it is simply the nature of a culture that constantly renews itself that threatens to end the “golden age of motorcycles,” supplanting these middle-aged men with younger, cockier replacements. Beyond this fraternity at least, there is another type of freedom to be sought which tears away the stoic front of the strongest man, letting them finally express their stifled anguish and shame. Those who live fast and die young may be immortalised in The Bikeriders, but perhaps the true winners are those who live long enough to find their own peace, holding gratefully onto what little they have left.

The Bikeriders is currently playing in cinemas.

Fellini’s Casanova (1976)

Federico Fellini | 2hr 28min

Each time famed adventurer Giacomo Casanova tumbles into another sexual escapade during his worldly travels, his wind-up bird is right there by his side, bobbing and flapping its wings in suggestive, mechanical motions. As both a literal and figurative cock, its phallic shape is not easily missed, casting giant shadows on the wall much like its owner’s. In any other sex scene, in any other film, it would be jarringly out of place – this act is meant to be one loaded with spontaneous passion after all, vulnerably exposing humanity’s most primal instincts. Within the lecherous ventures of Fellini’s Casanova though, this bird is simply an extension of the Venetian playboy’s libido, consistently ticking along like a metronome to Nino Rota’s contrived score of rigid, unwavering synths.

Though based on the memoirs of the real Casanova and his expansive voyage through 18th century Europe, Federico Fellini’s reimagining of his life manifests with demented surrealism, twisting the historical figure into a man trapped in cycles of meaningless carnal exploits. Sex in this decrepit world is not an expression of deep yearning, but rather an imitation of pleasure performed out of obligation, as if trying to convince oneself of an authentic, sensual connection that simply isn’t there.

Within Casanova’s lecherous ventures, the mechanical bird is simply an extension of the Venetian playboy’s libido, consistently ticking along like a metronome to Nino Rota’s contrived score of rigid, unwavering synths.

The giant head of Venus which sinks to the bottom of Venice’s Grand Canal in the opening scene becomes a symbolic reminder of this too, returning in the film’s final scene beneath the frozen surface to illustrate the abiding death of everything the goddess of love represents. In her absence, lovemaking is dispassionately chaotic. Coital partners seesaw in the most untitillating manner possible, while Fellini’s camera rocks and zooms in jerky motions as if synchronised to the ensemble’s outrageous acting.

The sunken head of Venus bookends Fellini’s Casanova – a mythic symbol of love trapped in icy waters.

Even outside of these scenes Casanova does not mark a significant achievement for Donald Sutherland, and yet his effeminate, foppish spin on the great Venetian adventurer nevertheless fits perfectly within Fellini’s garish scenery, thinly concealing a deeply insecure ego. After all, it is not his sexual vitality, but his intellectual pursuits as “a poet, philosopher, mathematician” which he would rather be known for – but if his prodigious reputation for bedding women is to be his legacy, then who is he to deny this extraordinary talent?

By the time Fellini adapted Casanova’s autobiography in the mid-1970s, he was no stranger to reshaping classical texts and historical eras with lurid experimentation, frequently sacrificing narrative convention in favour of episodic vignettes. As such, Fellini’s Casanova bears especially close resemblance to his cinematic interpretation of the Ancient Roman text Satyricon, which similarly journeyed through warped, theatrical landscapes that never seemed to feel the touch of natural sunlight. Casanova’s excursion to a Venetian island where a wealthy voyeur pays to watch him sexually perform lays the brazen theatricality bare in the opening scenes, sailing his boat across a black sea of billowing tarp, while his convergence with civilisation brings astoundingly anachronistic renderings of 18th century high society. Fellini carries a Sternbergian sense of unruly excess here as he clutters his colourful mise-en-scène with candles, statues, and exorbitantly large plates of food, painting Baroque portraits of overindulgence fuelled by an insatiable emptiness, and curating cinematic galleries of incredible orgiastic anarchy.

Aggressively theatrical mise-en-scène, floating Casanova’s boat atop an ocean of black, billowing tarp.
Fellini carries a Sternbergian sense of unruly excess here as he clutters his colourful mise-en-scène with candles, statues, and exorbitantly large plates of food, painting Baroque portraits of overindulgence fuelled by an insatiable emptiness.

In Rome, Casanova is invited to the patrician palace of the British ambassador, where a deranged party of obscene games demeans the surrounding historical art that once signified class and decorum. There, his pretentious attempts to wax lyrical philosophy are met with bewilderment, and to curry favour he instead participates in a contest with a peasant to determine who can sexually perform the most times in the space of an hour. In London, he attends a hypnotically gloomy Frost Fair on the River Thames, where he moves on from the suicidal grief of losing his girlfriend to another man and instead pins his new obsession on a royal giantess. Later in Württemberg he attends what is meant to be “the most beautiful court in Europe,” and yet which rather appears as a haywire nightmare of insane aristocrats wreaking havoc, while musicians fill the air with a dissonant cacophony emerging from the pianos and organs hanging off the walls.

Casanova moves from one party to the next, encountering bizarre characters and adventures, yet never quite finding the fulfilment he seeks.
A haywire nightmare in Württemberg, where musicians fill the air with a dissonant cacophony emerging from the pianos and organs hanging off the walls.
A dazzling composition of chandeliers hanging above Casanova at the opera – with his bigger budgets, Fellini does not half-commit to his production design.

The disconnection between these wandering vignettes somewhat hurts the overall form of Casanova, and yet this detachment also serves to underscore the wistful isolation at the core of Sutherland’s performance, elevating the moment where he discovers what he deems true love. It is during his adventures in Germany that he meets Rosalba, a life-sized mechanical doll who dances stiffly with the voyager like a ballerina in a music box, and whose only objection to his sexual advances is a silent, pained grimace. She is a bastion of unchanging purity in this world of absurdist mayhem – a clockwork contraption not unlike Casanova’s metal bird who reflects his desire for fastidious control over his emotions, relationships, and libido.

Rosalba the mechanical may be Casanova’s one true love, becoming bastion of unchanging purity in this world of absurdist mayhem.

Clearly little has changed in the decades that pass between their awkwardly romantic tryst and Casanova’s retirement from travelling, choosing to take up the role of librarian in a cold, draughty Bohemian castle as he approaches the end of his life. Still he attempts to impress audiences with dull poetry recitations, and still he is ridiculed for his pomposity, leaving him to retreat in shame to his darkened chamber where dreams of waltzing with Rosalba upon an icy Venetian lagoon await. As Rota’s music box motif tinkles a soft, metallic melody for the last time, they rotate like tiny figurines, eternally frozen in plastic. There, at the end of this traveller’s long life, Fellini finally reveals the impossible fantasy which has eluded him through many cities, parties, and romances – the frigid, lifeless embrace of a woman as hopelessly inhuman as him.

Resigned to the end of an empty life, Casanova retreats into his imagination with Rosalba. As Nino Rota’s music box motif tinkles a soft, metallic melody for the last time, they rotate like tiny figurines, eternally frozen in plastic.

Fellini’s Casanova as currently available to purchase from Amazon.

Hit Man (2023)

Richard Linklater | 1hr 55min

The concept of self is “a construct, an act, an illusion,” college professor Gary Johnson informs his students in the opening act of Hit Man. One could almost imagine this passage being spoken by any number of other Richard Linklater characters being carried away by their own intellectualism, though unlike those haughty young adults, Gary does not believe he has anything to prove. Instead, this lecture serves as meta-commentary, woven through a montage introducing the characters he adopts in his second job. As an undercover police contractor, Gary uses his extraordinary skills of deception to convince would-be criminals that he is an assassin for hire, before unleashing the full force of the law.

The attention to detail that Gary applies to these sting operations go beyond merely fulfilling his duty. He relishes the challenge of truly fooling others, tailoring fresh hitman personas to each client who comes his way. Patrick Bateman-style psychopaths in business suits, creepy Russian mobsters with crooked smiles, gun-toting rednecks lusting for violence – Linklater swiftly moves through every archetype in the book, studying the rapport that Gary builds with his clientele before cutting to their guilty mugshots. Each job is his chance to become someone else, constantly shedding his dweeby professor image until even he begins to question whether that is merely another act in his extensive repertoire.

It is a tough sell for Glen Powell to play so drastically against type, though like Gary, he is clearly having fun adopting the idiosyncrasies of each hitman character. Perhaps his ill fit in this role is also partially the point, as when he takes on the persona of suave hitman Ron to charm his newest client Madison, Powell immediately falls back into the charismatic leading man archetype that he has built his career upon thus far. His spur of the moment decision to sway Madison away from killing her abusive husband is the first small rebellion to foreshadow the rise of the aloof, rule-breaking Ron, who certainly at least feels a lot more in tune with Powell’s natural talents than Gary’s self-conscious mannerisms. The chemistry that Ron has with Madison is instant, and so it isn’t hard to see why Gary betrays his better instincts to pursue a dangerous romance with this woman who believes he is totally different person.

Hit Man is not so much a drift away from Linklater’s indie character dramas than it is a commercial diversion, joining his list of more straightforward comedies including School of Rock and Bernie. He revels in the black humour here, exposing Gary’s disturbingly intimate knowledge of how to dispose a body, as well as his playfully insensitive attitude towards matters of life and death. That much at least he has in common with Ron, leading to risky, even violent behaviour when his new relationship is complicated by Madison’s jealous husband Ray, as well as rival police contractor Jasper.

The name of Gary’s cats Id and Ego are no doubt a glaring clue to the psychological drama that lies beneath Linklater’s comedy, eventually rendered explicit in our protagonist’s class on Freudian psychoanalytic theory and its parallel editing with an impassioned sex scene. These lectures essentially become formal markers of Gary’s development, touching on some of history’s greatest thinkers until he inevitably arrives at the nihilistic philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. “The truth is created through the integration of different points of view, and there are no absolutes, either moral or epistemological,” he ponders aloud to his students.

“If the universe is not fixed, then neither are you, and you really can become a different and hopefully, better person.”

The question of where Gary ends and where Ron begins is essentially meaningless in Hit Man. There is freedom to be found in recognising the artifice of each persona one presents to the world, abandoning hope of true self-discovery, and thus adopting whatever identity allows a life of passion and abandon. Linklater is not blind to the darkness that lies in this existentialist outlook, sinking Gary/Ron ever further into an amoral void where good and evil are equally unrewarded and unpunished, yet Hit Man’s resolution would not be nearly as bleak if the dubious journey there weren’t also so recklessly enticing.

Hit Man is currently streaming on Netflix.

Amarcord (1973)

Federico Fellini | 2hr 7min

Spring arrives in the Italian village of Borgo San Giuliano with white, fluffy poplar seeds floating on the breeze, bearing a striking resemblance to the snow that has just melted away. In summer, school student Titta relishes the warm weather on a family day trip to the countryside, with his Uncle Teo being granted short-term leave from the psychiatric hospital where he resides. Autumn later brings cooler temperatures, and sees the vast majority of the population sail out on boats to witness the passage of the ocean liner SS Rex, while winter’s frozen grip on the small town heralds sickness and tragedy in Titta’s family.

The year that passes over the course of Amarcord is not bound by plot convention, and yet each vignette has its formal place in the eccentric portrait of 1930s Italy that Federico Fellini sentimentally models after his own childhood. Unlike the wandering odyssey of Satyricon or the pseudo-documentary of Roma, Amarcord never falters in its lively, easy-going pacing, loosely building its episodic formal progression around the seasonal changes and communal traditions of these villagers’ mundane lives.

Spring arrives with white, fluffy poplar seeds on the breeze – an annual occurrence that each year enraptures the small town of Borgo San Giuliano.
Summer brings warmer, brighter days, as Titta visits the countryside with his family and Uncle Teo for an amusing escapade.
The SS Rex passes by the town in Autumn, met by locals eager to witness this feat of maritime engineering.
Winter settles over the village, the snowflakes bearing notable resemblance to Spring’s white poplar seeds.

Perhaps then we must look even further back to I Vitelloni for the closest comparison in Fellini’s filmography, similarly trapping young men within cyclical routines that connect them to a larger community and hamper their dreams of escape. Like his 1953 hangout film, the camerawork here is dynamic, gliding and panning in breezy tracking shots that gently soak in the remarkable scenery. Even then though, the difference between Fellini’s early neorealist-adjacent style and the vibrant surrealism of Amarcord is gaping, as if his own nostalgic reflections have grown more playfully distorted with age. Characters here slip into dreams with careless abandon, dwelling on fables that infuse Borgo San Giuliano with its own spectacular mythology, and distant fantasies that may only ever live in their minds.

This town’s distinctive character comes together in scenes of communal celebration and tradition, the camera gliding breezily through the detailed mise-en-scène.
The town of Titta’s adolescence also possesses its own unique mythology, manifesting with surreal wonder in the dreams and memories of its people.

Little do these people know, they themselves will one day become legends to be wistfully recalled by a grown Titta in years to come as well, colouring in the vibrant ensemble of his life with effervescent idiosyncrasies as they rotate in and out of Amarcord’s narrative. Much like Saraghina from 8 ½, the town’s beach-dwelling prostitute Volpina becomes a subject of fantasy for Titta during his adolescent sexual awakening. Local hairdresser Gradisca is conversely a far more untouchable beauty, frequently drawing stares in her shapely red dresses and hiding a loneliness that delicately parallels Titta’s own discontent. The Grand Hotel where she is rumoured to have slept with a prince also plays host to a tall tale propagated by food vendor Biscein that comically details his wild night with 28 foreign concubines, while the long-suffering town lawyer perseveres through the heckling of neighbours to relay this village’s culture and folklore directly to the audience.

Minor characters cycle in and out of Fellini’s vignettes, fulfilling familiar archetypes wherever they are needed – the town prostitute, the untouchable beauty, the friendly lawyer.

The absolute persistence of ‘Mr. Lawyer’ in offering a scholarly perspective on Borgo San Giuliano is amusingly at odds with its pragmatic, free-spirited people, and it is telling that he is the one of the few to regularly break the fourth wall. “Theirs is an exuberant, generous, loyal, and tenacious nature,” he kindly elucidates, describing their proud heritage that runs “Roman and Celtic blood in their veins.” His appearances are intermittent, yet his self-aware monologues work powerfully to divorce Amarcord from the naturalism it occasionally leans towards, sweeping us into the subjective realm of memory where Fellini is at his strongest as a filmmaker.

Nino Rota’s endless variations of the film’s main theme capture this whimsy with carnivalesque panache as well, and are absolutely crucial to the sensitive evolution of each scene. The motif swoons on strings as the camera romantically glides through a frozen tableau of soldiers, forms the jazzy underscore to Titta and his friends’ waltz with imaginary women in the foggy darkness, and even passes diegetically to a musician playing his flute in a barbershop. Its joviality is resilient, never quite losing its optimism even as it fades out with the village lights dimming at night, and ultimately becoming a pure expression of the town’s own flamboyant character.

A dream frozen in time – the camera gently drifts through the Grand Hotel with mystical intrigue.
A dense fog settles over the town, while Titta and his friends waltz with imaginary women, deep in a trance.

It is quite remarkable as well that every street, building, and monument of Borgo San Giuliano is entirely constructed on studio sets, allowing Fellini a level of control over his handsomely offbeat mise-en-scène that captures a specific era in an isolated region of Italy. At the same time, the scale of Amarcord’s production is enormous, transforming this village into an entire world – which of course it is to an adolescent Titta. The cultural and historical detail woven into the architecture is particularly rich, though Fellini also chooses opportune moments to subtly let authenticity slide for a more wistful evocation of his hometown of Rimini instead, cutting out sharp shadows and silhouettes in his low-key lighting. Even the Victory Monument which stands in its square is recreated with impressionistic elegance, baring the backside of a woman that draws the lustful gaze of visitors, while the small addition of angel wings elevates this voluptuous figure to a level of divinity that exists only in Fellini’s memory.

One of Amarcord’s strongest compositions arrives at the Victory Monument, baring the backside of an angel who draws the lustful gaze of visitors venturing out into the rain.

In those moments of surrealism where this narrative departs from reality altogether, Amarcord moreover reveals a pointed, satirical edge aimed towards the nationalistic tyranny bearing down on Italy’s younger generations. When Mussolini comes to town, the red-and-white papier-mâché model of his face that is raised in a formal procession is laughably cartoonish, and even begins speaking when Titta’s lovestruck classmate Ciccio imagines it marrying him to his crush, Aldina. Suddenly, this military ceremony transforms into a wedding before our eyes, and the fascist pageantry is defanged as red, green, and white confetti is joyously tossed over the underage newlyweds.

Fellini delivers one excellent set piece after another, mocking the obsessive, fascist pageantry of the era with a giant papier-mâché face of Mussolini who springs to life and weds a pair of young school students.

Fellini continues to send up the stern teachers at Titta’s school and the church’s ineffective Catholic priests with mischievous glee as well, and yet he is also delicately aware of the malice which lurks within these institutions. There is no comedy to be found in the local authority’s torture of Titta’s father for making vaguely anti-fascist remarks, nor in their chilling speeches of “glowing ideals from ancient times.”

With baggage like this attached to otherwise cheerful memories, maybe it is best for them to remain in the past, Fellini contemplates, though not without sparing a sad thought for those like Gradisca who were carried away by the cultural norms of the era. She may have been the subject of many fantasies in her eye-catching red, black, and white outfits, but she is still a woman with her own hopes and insecurities, revealed in fleeting glimpses behind her veil of cool, feminine confidence. Perhaps then the loneliness which brings her to tears one night in front of a crowd is also what spurs her to marry a fascist officer in the final scene of Amarcord, even as her own fate beyond the inevitable fall of Italy’s totalitarian regime is left sorrowfully ambiguous.

The camera pans across this low-lying landscape just outside town, where Gradisca marries a fascist officer and resigns herself to an uncertain future. Titta’s absence is only barely noted – this too is a turning point for him to carve out a new future away from the only home he has ever known.

She is evidently not the only one leaving Borgo San Giuliano with dreams of brighter futures either. As the camera slowly pans with the remaining wedding guests across the countryside, their distant shouts offhandedly mention Titta’s departure with little elaboration. Given the recent passing of his mother from an infectious illness though, it isn’t hard for us to surmise the reason. The winter months have wreaked devastation on his family, and their funereal grief has been absorbed into yet another communal ritual carried out with depressingly rote perseverance.

Still, time continues to traipse forward, seeing spring’s puffballs replace the glacial winter snow and old memories give birth to new beginnings. Escaping the routines that govern this community need not arrive as a grand epiphany, but may even be as subtle as a silent, unremarkable departure, leaving one’s name to be fondly recalled by those who have stayed behind.

The loss of Titta’s mother also marks his loss of innocence – a rite of passage which, unlike all those other small ventures throughout the year, is carried out with depressing perseverance.

After all, within Fellini’s portrait of evaporated childhood, memory moves in both directions. Distance across time and space may erode our physical connection with old friends, yet those relationships are revived in the mercurial oceans of nostalgia. Just as the past wistfully lingers in the present, the present sways the past, constantly remoulding it into new forms that reveal previously hidden truths. Only through Amarcord’s reality-warping hindsight can Fellini recognise the absurd norms of his youth with the nuance they deserve, from the oppressive evils and mournful insecurities of his neighbours, to the sweet, boundless joys that have faded with the encroachment of adulthood.

Amarcord is currently streaming on The Criterion Channel, is available to rent or buy on Apple TV, and Amazon Video, and can be purchased on Amazon.

A Quiet Place: Day One (2024)

Michael Sarnoski | 1hr 39min

The average volume of New York City sits at 90 decibels on any given day, the opening title card A Quiet Place: Day One informs us – the equivalent of a constant scream. There may be no place more dangerous to be when John Krasinski’s blind, sound-sensitive aliens crash-land on fragmented meteors in the film’s opening minutes, immediately decimating Manhattan’s population. The streets that were crowded with traffic and pedestrians a few minutes earlier are now an urban wasteland of dust, smoke, and debris, recalling familiar scenes of disaster that the city suffered only a couple of decades ago during the September 11 attacks. This is the point that the world changes in the A Quiet Place universe, forcing humanity into an agonising silence as the urge to scream grows ever louder.

Krasinski’s resignation from the role of director in the series ushers in new talent for this prequel, giving indie filmmaker Michael Sarnoski the chance to apply his knack for drama and suspense to the horror genre. His 2021 debut film Pig showcased his fine control over a slow-burn narrative, as well as a patience behind the camera that translates effectively into the tension-ridden set pieces of Day One. Even his protagonists in these two films share common characteristics, seeing both relish life’s finer luxuries as they grapple with grief, mortality, and an enduring loyalty to their animal companions.

Where cancer patient Sam begins to diverge from Pig’s ex-chef is in her fiery wit and cynical vigour, fighting to feel alive in the face of certain death. She is not one to relinquish control to nurses or hospice restrictions, but is determined to maintain a sense of dignity when her time comes. As such, Sarnoski’s reframing of A Quiet Place’s extra-terrestrial threat into an allegory for terminal illness is conducted with impressive deftness. Finally, Sam is witnessing the world confront the same fear that she has live with day-to-day, yet been unable to express in any form outside her poetry. That her motivation remains the same both before and after the attack is incredibly telling – a single slice of pizza from Patsy’s in East Harlem is the endgame, letting her taste a treasured childhood memory before either the monsters or the cancer takes her.

Sam’s characterisation is perhaps the most crucial difference between this instalment in the series and previous A Quiet Place films, with Day One often leaning more into survival drama than outright horror. This balance works particularly well for Lupita Nyong’o who builds on her nascent scream queen status following Us, revealing a fierce protectiveness over Frodo the cat who genuinely seems to have nine lives, while also exploring her screen chemistry with Joseph Quinn’s British law student, Eric. Theirs is not a romantic connection, but a friendship that is slowly built upon a foundation of empathy, self-sacrifice, and humour, finding joy within New York’s few remaining comforts.

On a larger scale, Day One displays some intriguing world building as civilians and the military both try to analyse the situation as it is developing, working through processes of trial and error. Sarnoski uses the urban geography well, distinguishing it from the first two films with its skyscrapers, subway tunnels, and hubs of a once-lively American culture. Meanwhile, the island setting is a godsend for those who can escape Manhattan before it is quarantined, and a death sentence for those left stranded.

Landing as the third film in this series, Day One’s pacing grows tired in its repetitive plot cycle – survivors try to remain quiet, a loud noise is made, the monsters attack, and then a return to quietude – yet Sarnoski still finds room to explore the impossibility of achieving total silence in a densely-populated city. The gentle shuffle of crowds moving in unison towards rescue boats keeps us on edge, even without any individual producing enough noise to draw attention on their own, and it is only inevitable that this metropolis of metal, glass, and machinery will turn on its inhabitants. The creativity in moments like these would be enough to justify this prequel’s existence, were it not for Sam’s stirring journey of acceptance already doing the heavy lifting. Perhaps the A Quiet Place series will soon run its course, exposing the thinness of a premise that tends to fall back on formulaic set pieces, though the team-up between Sarnoski and Nyong’o in Day One at least proves that there is still compelling drama to be mined from the stifling, deadly silence of this alien invasion.

A Quiet Place: Day One is currently playing in cinemas.

Fellini’s Roma (1972)

Federico Fellini | 2hr 8min

The two eras of Rome that Federico Fellini displays in his offbeat homage to the Italian city are set apart by three decades, though the boundaries separating one from the other aren’t always so clearly outlined. Hippies lounge around ancient monuments in the 1970s, air raids send civilians running for cover in the 1940s, and yet still life goes on for those who seek the simple pleasures of sex, entertainment, and good food. After all, what else is there to cling to in a world eternally bound within a state of perpetual chaos?

This is not quite the Rome chronicled in history books, nor the Rome captured with authenticity in the films of the Italian neorealists. This is Fellini’s Roma – an absurd, urban landscape defined more by its culture, politics, and traditions than any individual icon. Not to say that Fellini’s film lacks idiosyncratic characters – in fact virtually everyone here sets themselves apart from the colourful crowd – but they are simply threads woven into a larger, vibrant tapestry. Despite its familiar interrogations of modern Rome’s debauchery, Roma bears far greater resemblance to the surreal, episodic madness of Fellini Satyricon than the focused character study of La Dolce Vita. Such a grandiose defiance of narrative convention comes with some structural unevenness, though Fellini’s recreation of the city he both loathes and adores is nonetheless rich with impressionistic detail, filtering moments in time through the wily incongruity of satire and memory.

A city littered with millennia of history – fading, crumbling, yet always to be replaced with new artefacts and stories.
Hippies lounge around ancient monuments in the 1970s while bombs drop on Rome in the 1940s – parallel timelines marked by war and celebration.

If there is a consistent character in Roma whom we are to follow beyond Rome itself, then it is the strange presence of Fellini himself in two forms. The first is a semi-autobiographical representation of the director watching silent films about Ancient Rome as a child, and later moving to the Nazi-occupied city as a young man. The camera moves with him past magnificent fountains and cathedrals in travelogue-style tracking shots, before he finally finds lodging at a shabby guesthouse bustling with vain actors, rowdy children, and religious zealots. The insanity seemingly has no boundaries, populating the streets at night with noisy al fresco restaurant patrons, and still we continue weaving through the crowd as our attention jumps from a waiter carrying a plate of pasta to the young Fellini being invited to eat with friendly strangers.

Fellini self-autobiographically enters the film as his younger self moving to Rome, embracing all that the city has to offer.

This version of Fellini is often little more than a passive observer accompanying our journey, while the second cinematic representation of the filmmaker manifests as an older, wiser extension of the same man – an unseen tour guide of sorts, offering amusing descriptions and opinions on Rome’s eclectic culture through omniscient voiceover. He is our constant companion through this adventure, possessing a whimsical self-awareness as he introduces a “portrait of Rome” exactly as a young, naïve Fellini once perceived it – “a mixture of strange, contradictory images.” Later as we stumble across Italian actress Anna Magnani walking home to her palazzo, this voiceover even holds a conversation with her, distilling all the facets of Rome down to this living symbol who has lived out its many lives on film.

“Rome seen as vestal virgin, and she-wolf. An aristocrat, and a tramp. A sombre buffoon.”

Rome’s proclivity towards fascism echoes through time, dominating the culture with fervent nationalism and authoritarianism.

On occasion, Roma does not always handle these fourth wall breaks so well, leading to some patchiness in one highway scene that turns the camera back on Fellini’s own crew capturing the traffic jam. Jean-Luc Godard’s Weekend is the obvious influence here, as we observe anarchy unfold on the roads one stormy night. Dead animals, burning trucks, hippie protestors, and police barricades are illuminated under harsh spotlights to paint an image of societal breakdown, but for once the chaos seems to escape Fellini’s control.

Some vignettes in Roma are more effective than others, and the highway set piece is one that suffers in comparison.

It is evident that Fellini handles the mayhem with greater poise when he is aligning these disordered elements under unified set pieces, digging into the bedrock of culture and history the city quite literally rests upon. The wondrous regard these people hold for their heritage is not to be outdone by their relentless pursuit of progress, as industrials drills paving the way for a new transit system smash the walls of an ancient Roman house to pieces, revealing alabaster sculptures, mosaics, and frescoes that have miraculously survived for two thousand years. “Look how they seem to be staring at us,” one woman remarks as these artworks cast a stern eye upon their new visitors. Suddenly, the paint’s exposure to the outside air triggers a rapid deterioration, and thus these representatives of the ancient world cast their final judgement on modern civilisation for its graceless, irresponsible ineptitude.

The tension between past and present comes through bleakly in the industrial dig site. Attempts at establishing a new underground transit system are frequently halted by historical discoveries, and inadvertently ruin them in the process.

Still, little can erase the immense pride of a culture that annually celebrates the Festa de’ Noantri – literally translating to ‘Festival of Ourselves.’ Fellini stations his handheld camera in a car as it passes by colourful lights, bustling crowds, and folk musicians filling the air with joy, capturing a slice of the real celebration in an almost documentary-like manner, and even bringing in American writer Gore Vidal to reflect on his life in Rome. “This is the city of illusions,” he ponders to an audience of rapt listeners. “It’s a city, after all, of the church, of government, of movies. They’re all makers of illusions.”

Fellini’s location shooting soaks in the sights of the Festa de Noantri – the lights, the food, the community, everything comes together to form a lively picture of Roman celebration and joy.

Fellini does not attempt to escape from beneath the shadow of this reputation either, but rather devotes his vision of Rome to its extraordinary artifice, understanding that the truth never lies far from its projected façade. With Roma’s production taking place a few years after Vatican II, this is especially relevant to the church’s struggle of identity in a modern world, and thus he launches a scathing attack upon its attempted reinvention through a hilariously gaudy fashion show.

“Model number one: Patience in a classical line of black satin for novices,” the emcee announces to the crowd of cardinals, bishops, and nobles, as a pair of nuns walk down the catwalks in glossy habits and leather boots “suitable for Arctic wear.” Next, two more nuns with headdresses that flap like turtledove wings, priests on roller skates clad in “robes for sport,” and then men in frilly doilies swinging thuribles with choreographed panache – “Elegance and high fashion for the sacristan in first-class ceremonies.” The ecclesiastical accoutrements only grow more ridiculous, eventually culminating in the arrival of the Pope himself on a blinding white set, radiating sunbeams as the audience collapses to their knees in awe.

The true highlight of Roma comes in the form of an ecclesiastical fashion show, sending up the material obsession of the Catholic Church is it seeks a connection to modern culture. Particularly magnificent costume work from Danilo Donati.

Costume designer Danilo Donati must be commended for the visual extravagance of this vignette, though it is Fellini’s genius which unites each garment under a single, scathing criticism of religious hypocrisy, and its attempts to win modern audiences through material spectacle. Then again, how can we blame the church for appealing to the masses in such an excessive manner when the people themselves are so blinded by escapist self-indulgence? Men from across the lower and upper ends of this society are far more likely to frequent local bordellos for a taste of intimacy, as Fellini only separates their endeavours by the sophistication of the facilities themselves. In the shabbier brothel, a long corridor fills with working class men hoping to pair off with a woman, before it is eventually shut down by police. In the more luxurious one, older men take their pick of the escorts before taking an elevator up into grand bedrooms decorated with red wallpaper and classical paintings.

An up-class and rundown brothel continue to draw parallels between different segments of Rome, uniting its men as seekers of physical pleasure.

Art and entertainment similarly prove to be effective distractions from the ills of the modern world, manifesting in the 1970s as a film director neglecting to depict the negative aspects of Rome, and in the 1940s as a vaudeville show that unites audience members in laughter, bawdiness, and nationalistic sentiment. The musical and comedy acts run for a little too long here, but the announcement of Germany and Italy’s successful defence of Sicily that interrupts the performances is worth it, erupting in disconcerting cries of support from the crowd.

The irony that this jubilant resolve dissipates into pandemonium the moment sirens start blaring a few short moments later is not to be missed. “Whose baby is this?” one patron shouts upon discovering a baby left alone in the evacuated theatre, while outside Fellini shoots the emptying streets in a chilly blue wash. Though present-day Rome has long moved past the terror and instability of World War II, the insecurity that comes to light here is a ghost that continues to haunt this city – a city which, as Vidal elucidates, “has died so many times and was resurrected so many times.”

A haunting juxtaposition between Rome’s nationalistic celebration and the violent bombing a few short minutes later – this is a snapshot of a city in turmoil, at odds with its own contradictions.

More specifically, it is Rome’s historical inclination towards fascism which can’t quite be expelled from its culture, and which becomes the subject of the town fool’s rhyming couplets comparing Italian dictators across time. “This fascist shit, his head is split,” he cackles at a damaged statue of Julius Caesar, before turning his insubordinate poem to the 1940s.

“Now we’ve got another meanie,

By the name of Mussolini.”

Fellini’s obvious disdain towards the police in the 1970s timeline formally brings this partisan statement full circle, noting that despite the political lull, there remains an oppressive, authoritarian influence quashing freedoms in contemporary Rome. These people may find any excuse for a communal celebration of family, art, food, or religion, and yet such lively passions can sway dangerously towards prejudice with the right provocation. “It seems to me the perfect place to watch if we end or not,” Vidal predicts, and by the end of Roma, Fellini has thoroughly substantiated his claim. Within this vividly surreal portrait, its culture is a vibrant epicentre of history and modernity, community and intolerance, highbrow art and lowbrow entertainment – and worth cherishing in all its wonders, contradictions, and flaws.

Fellini’s Roma is currently available to buy from Amazon.

Out of Africa (1985)

Sydney Pollack | 2hr 41min

For Baroness Karen von Blixen, the vast plains and farming communities of Africa are a liberating escape. The Danish aristocracy she was born into is one of cold conservatism and rigid social conventions, necessitating a marriage to Baron Bror Blixen – not her first choice, given that he is the brother of the man who spurned her romantic approach, but a satisfactory match nonetheless. The ranch he has purchased in East Africa is to be their new residence, and in time will expose the suffocating confines of her previous home in Europe, as a rejuvenating enlightenment unfolds through meditative voiceovers destined to one day be recorded in the pages of her memoir Out of Africa.

For big-game hunter Denys Finch Hatton however, Africa is not merely an escape when the pressures of the world grow too intense. From the moment he arrived as a young man, there was nowhere else he could have possibly lived. These grasslands and savannahs are his home, not so much soothing his restless soul than embodying the untamed zest for life that has existed inside him since birth. It is clear to see how the romance between Karen and Denys blossoms in their mutual appreciation for this environment and its surrounding culture, yet this subtle difference is not an easy one to overcome. Just as this land of primal beauty defies the influence of its colonisers, so too does Denys resist the expectations of domesticity imposed by European tradition, and its attempts to impose arbitrary structures on life’s natural order.

The frozen landscapes of Denmark open Karen’s story, and its severe aesthetic couldn’t be more juxtaposed against the warm, earthy scenery of Africa.
Pollack is evidently a huge David Lean admirer, composing landscapes that follow on from Lawrence of Arabia and Doctor Zhivago.
A rustic beauty to Pollack’s mise-en-scène, held together by ropes, wood, and tattered fabric.

Set against the 1910s colonial backdrop of the nation soon to be officially recognised as Kenya, there are no two ways around Karen’s romanticisation of a disruptive, traumatic era in the history of the region, yet there is little else one can expect from the sentimental reminiscences of a Danish noblewoman. Though she labours alongside Kikuyu workers on her coffee plantation, she lives in a bubble of idyllic bliss distant from their hardships, gracefully delineated through the entwining of her lyrical narration with Sydney Pollack’s impressionistic editing. Long dissolves weave a dreamy elegance through scene transitions, and gentle montages formally bridge gaps in time between each episode in her life as she poetically reflects on her deep connection to the land, persisting even during her brief return home to Denmark. Naturally, this development unfolds purely through voiceover, as the visuals effectively keep us present with her distracted heart and mind in Africa.

Pollack’s work with silhouettes and natural light is jaw-dropping, making up many of the film’s strongest compositions.
Dreamy long dissolves create new images, leading to implicit connections as Denys is surrounded with fire.

The impact of these montages are only magnified by Pollack’s vibrant photography of Kenya’s expansive vistas, imprinting silhouettes of men and animals against hazy, red sunsets, and composing establishing shots from its dry desert scenery with a picturesque grandeur. The period production design of 1910s colonial Africa is certainly a fine accomplishment too, capturing Europe’s attempt to maintain a semblance of noble sophistication as they impose their highbrow culture on such rugged landscapes, though Out of Africa rises to even greater stylistic heights when Denys finally invites Karen aboard his biplane. Even the film’s greatest detractors cannot deny the raw power of this sequence, gliding through aerial shots of flamingos flocking across lakes, wildebeest herds galloping through plains, and waterfalls cascading into lush green forests. John Barry’s grand orchestral score reaches its dynamic peak here too, evocatively recapitulating the film’s main theme which, like the plane itself, continues ascending until it reaches a scintillating climax.

The biplane flight is brilliantly shot, edited, and scored, revelling in the beauty of Africa from a fresh perspective in its aerial shots.

The irony that underlies this scene’s long shots sets in with a mournful realisation – our appreciation of Africa’s staggering beauty only increases the further up we fly, with the scenery eventually disappearing altogether once we are above the clouds. These stunning landscapes can be remotely admired, but never fully embraced by an outsider like Karen, and through this conceit Out of Africa develops an eloquent metaphor for her own relationship with Denys. The nostalgic subtext of her narration tenderly illustrates this yearning, reflecting on just how much her love for both the man and his habitat has magnified from a distance, while Meryl Streep’s astounding emulation of the real Karen von Blixen’s Danish accent imbues her contemplations with an almost musical quality.

No doubt there’s also some John Ford here with the framing of horizons, blocking, and patterns in unusual natural features – painterly mise-en-scène.

If there is any regret expressed in these voiceovers, then it comes with full understanding that there was never any possible long-term relationship between Karen nor Denys that would have satisfied both parties. She requires stability following her divorce from Bror, yet Denys makes it abundantly clear that he does not wish to be tied down to any oppressive institution that might potentially tear him away from the wild whims of his heart. As such, their passionate romance begins to fade into memory, and is soon definitively buried with Denys’ body after a tragic biplane accident. “He brought us joy, and we loved him well,” Karen dolefully eulogises at his funeral. As she gazes out over the spectacular view from his grave though, she knows she cannot lay claim to his heart.

“He was not ours. He was not mine.”

A fitting location for Denys’ grave, overlooking the African prairie that he had such a kinship with – lush with greenery and teeming with wildlife.

If Africa and Denys are one in Karen’s mind, then the fire which destroys her farm and sends her back home to Denmark is essentially analogous with her lover’s death. As she quietly wanders among its people and terrains for the last time, her voiceover delivers the concluding passage of her memoir, romantically pondering what remnants of their relationship might remain after she has departed.

“If I know a song of Africa, of the giraffe and the African new moon lying on her back, of the ploughing the fields and the sweaty faces of the coffee pickers, does Africa know a song of me? Will the air over the plain quiver with a colour that I have had on? Or will the children invent a game in which my name is? Or the full moon throw a shadow over the gravel of the drive that was like me? Or will the eagles of the Ngong Hills look out for me?”

The death of Denys formally aligns with the destruction of her farm, both equally bringing her life in Africa to a close.

Karen understands that to revere a land as incomprehensibly vast and complex as Africa is to also realise that it will never admire her back, yet through her memory of Denys, Out of Africa preserves a vestige of hope. With her greatest love laid to rest in its rugged wilderness, Pollack’s exquisite final shot points to the remnant of her presence that eternally lingers with his spirit – the respectful, unassuming humility of an outsider, freely exchanging material possession for a divine connection to the Earth, to humanity, and to one’s own mortal soul.

Out of Africa is currently streaming on Binge, is available to rent or buy on Apple TV, YouTube, and Amazon Video, and is available to purchase on Amazon.