Weekend (1967)

Jean-Luc Godard | 1hr 45min

When we initially land in the bizarre modern landscape of Weekend, it appears as if civilisation is standing on a precipice, tentatively waiting to tip over into absurdist anarchy. When cheating lovers Corinne and Roland eventually hit the road, it quickly becomes clear though that this is not the case – as far as Jean-Luc Godard is concerned, society is already there, consumed by its own avarice and hubris. Together, both spouses intend to claim their inheritance from Corinne’s parents, though privately they also plant to murder each other afterwards and greedily take more than what is rightfully theirs. By every economic, political, and social metric, they are the most standard definition of twentieth century bourgeoisie, self-absorbed in their materialistic mindsets while naively unaffected by the disaster unfolding around them. It is only a matter of time before they too are brought down to the grotesque level of squalor that those below them have been suffering through for their entire lives.

Coming out at the tail-end of Godard’s magnificent run of postmodern films in the 1960s, Weekend also signals a more politically-inclined direction for the French auteur that would last several more decades, yet would never reach anywhere near the heights of his early career. For now though, his Marxist-Leninist ideals that had previously only touched the surface in films like La Chinoise emerge fully formed here, coalescing almost flawlessly with his radical formal artistry.

Godard’s satire is more political than ever, eviscerating the clueless bourgeoisie who journey through modern hellscapes without acknowledging the downfall of civilisation.

As it is, Weekend marks the last true masterpiece of the French New Wave, subversively making as much a target out of the socioeconomic conventions of 1960s France as the medium of film itself. The two cannot be separated in Godard’s post-ironic deconstructions, purposefully muddling his love of cinema with his impulse to pull us from its emotional grip, rip it apart, and expose it as little more than a two-dimensional illusion of light flickering on a screen. The sporadic intertitles that interrupt its narrative and rhythmic flow are an integral part of this, romantically describing this work of cinema early on as “A film adrift in the cosmos”,before almost immediately eviscerating itself with a far more self-deprecating reproach – “A film found on a dump.” When civilisation comes crashing down as it has in Weekend, art holds very little significance, and yet even within these contradictions Godard still can’t help cherishing the creative expression it grants him.

A classic self-reflexive device from Godard – interrupting intertitles commenting on the film itself, sardonically undercutting whatever significance we place in it as a piece of art.

He is evidently not the only one trivially obsessed with pop culture in the midst of an apocalypse either, with a faction of rebels taking the titles of classic films as their code names – “Battleship Potemkin calling The Searchers” – while writer Emily Brontë and French revolutionary Louis Antoine de Saint-Just surreally wander through anachronistic vignettes. Like all of Godard’s greatest films, Weekend is an eclectic pastiche of both recognisable and obscure icons, embracing the inevitability of artistic theft while demonstrating the possibility of still creating something valuable and original. Incredible artistic feats such as this are all too scarce in an era of dull cliches, refusing to see the potential of pre-existing material to build anything other than soulless nostalgia, and it is this stubborn passiveness on a more universal scale which damns the French society of Weekend to its dystopian grave. These citizens who seem to be driving nowhere in particular would much rather tear each other down with violent, petty road rage than continue towards their destination.

Figures of English and French history make appearances at the end of human civilisation, building something new out of familiar references to European culture.

When motorists aren’t furiously wielding tennis racquets and rifles over their crashed cars, it is more than likely that we will instead find them stuck in endless traffic jams, thus forming another visual metaphor that Godard saturates with Kafkaesque insanity. In one of the defining shots of his career, the camera tracks from left to right along a string of cars on an open country road while Corinne and Roland roll comfortably down an empty lane, skipping the inconveniences that lower classes must suffer through. A cacophony of perpetual beeps screams through the air, doing little to ease the congestion which grows progressively stranger the further along we travel.

A man and a boy throwing a ball between cars, a vehicle turned completely upside down, a truck of monkeys making an escape, a horse and wagon standing atop a pile of faeces, an elderly couple playing chess on the road – for eight minutes, Godard drags us through tableaux of trivial nonsense, revealing the time-wasting frivolity that grows from a lack of forward movement. In case we become too comfortable in the offbeat rhythms of this long take, he cuts in a couple of timestamps indicating the minutes that pass from 1.40pm to 2.10pm, and he also irrationally loops back on the same cars a couple of times as well. We shouldn’t be surprised to find what is causing the holdup at the end of the traffic, but it is shocking nonetheless. A bloody, violent collision has streaked the road with blood, and left the corpses of adults and children lying on the roadside.

Weekend’s brilliant cinematic high arrives in the tracking shot following the absurdly long line of traffic, growing steadily more ridiculous bit by bit.
At the end of the tracking shot, a spattering of blood and violence – dead bodies from the car collision are little more than time-consuming inconveniences in the grand scheme of things.

These cars may have once been proud emblems of modern industry and progress, and yet in Weekend they prove to be nothing more than pathetically inept status symbols, superficially signifying one’s wealth before perishing and potentially destroying their owners along with them. What starts as a biting gag in the film’s opening minutes gradually evolves into a dark formal motif, as well as a colourfully derelict part of Godard’s daunting wastelands bizarrely littered with burning vehicles. When his characters aren’t stealing clothes from dead bodies, they rarely give these a second look.

Godard’s mise-en-scène is littered with cars, forming a creative dystopian landscape out of these icons of technological progress.
Godard’s violence is always drenched in artifice, sending up the action of Hollywood movies.

The only time we even see a collision in action rather than just the aftermath is when Corinne and Roland eventually lose their car in one, and yet even here Godard does not seek to capitalise on salacious thrills, instead wishing to remind his audience of the hollow artifice in such gratuitous spectacle. As our central couple lose control of their car, the film reel and projector appear to malfunction as well, chaotically slipping the image offscreen before stabilising on the image of the subsequent fiery wreck. At first, we might think that the bloodcurdling scream coming from the debris might finally offer us sincere, personal stakes, until we hear the shrieking woman cry out the source of her horror.

“My Hermès handbag!”

The first time we almost see an actual collision unfold, Godard runs the film off its tracks and the projector malfunctions, rendering the salacious thrills offscreen.

Even when the world is crashing and burning, the bourgeoisie will only begin to panic when those material luxuries that dull the existential pain are lost. When they’re the ones hitchhiking on an open road and begging for help, they also find out very quickly how hypocritical their own kind are. “Are you in a film or in reality?” one woman stops to ask. “In a film,” Roland responds, clearly giving the incorrect answer as the would-be good Samaritan drives off. Two more drivers also pull over to check the superficial political alliances of this stranded couple. “Would you rather be screwed by Mao or Johnson?” one of them inquires, before decisively making up their prejudiced mind when Roland chooses Johnson.

“Drive on, Jean. He’s a fascist.”

These petty political divisions may be even more insidious than those instances of road rage we witness elsewhere, elevating a shallow commitment to political ideals above moral goodness and survival. For as long as Godard is delivering commentary such as this with his usual creativity and wit, Weekend continues to move along to its own unpredictable rhythmic dissonance, and yet the point at which he stops the film in its tracks to linger on a political speech is far too plain to be considered inspired on any cinematic level. The highlight reel of previous scenes that he intermittently cuts in over the top does little to offset the dryness as well, marking a serious blemish on what is otherwise a masterpiece of post-classical filmmaking.

A bizarre jump cut deliberately breaking the immersion of the scene, as a field of ruined cars humorously turns into a field of sheep.

On one hand, it is tough to imagine a slightly younger Godard from the early 1960s carelessly falling back on a scene like this, though by nature of his dynamic, ever-changing style, such variation also comes with the territory of artistic innovation. After all, the long takes that appear throughout Weekend are not something we had seen from him before either, and yet they are constantly used to much more brilliant effect here as we wander environments in tracking shots and 360-degree pans. They are superbly controlled in their execution, pushing in and out on Corinne and Roland’s silhouettes early on as she erotically describes an affair, and elsewhere holding an air of constant surprise as Godard slowly reveals a mishmash of incongruent vignettes – a man playing drums off to the side in a forest, for instance, or the bored spectators watching a farmer play Mozart. Like the director himself, he too is holding onto his own irrelevant form of artistic expression while an indifferent society collapses around him.

A long take pushing in and out of these silhouettes early on, freezing the couple in darkness as they discuss their erotic affairs.
The long takes and movements of Weekend are unusual for Godard who has always relied far more on his editing, and yet their use here still feels true to his Brechtian irony as the camera wanders off in the middle of scenes.

On an even broader level, it is also thanks to these long camera movements that Godard’s apocalyptic world feels so expansive, not so much aiming to establish any rigorous internal logic within it than to create the impression of a giant, meaningless odyssey. After all, was this catastrophic journey really worth the money at the end? Our two spoiled adventurers might think so at first, even going so far as to kill Corinne’s mother when she refuses to hand it over, though their success is cut short when this anarchic wasteland rears its ugly head one last time, landing them in the hands of violently radical hippies. Roland is gruesomely disembowelled – “The horror of the bourgeoisie can only be overcome by more horror,” they explain – and Corinne doesn’t think twice to join in cannibalising her husband when she gets hungry. It is an amusingly out-of-left-field move from Godard to end this absurdist critique of consumer society by watching it ultimately devour itself, but if there is any consistency to be found at all within the sprawling chaos of Weekend, then we can at least reliably expect these vain, pampered materialists to be the source of their own inexorable ruin.

‘Eating the rich’ depicted with gruesome irony – a capitalist’s dystopia is an anarchist’s paradise.

Weekend is currently streaming on The Criterion Channel, and the Blu-ray or DVD can be purchased on Amazon.

Le Samouraï (1967)

Jean-Pierre Melville | 1hr 45min

It is no mistake that we find it so easy to confuse the police officers and gangsters of Le Samouraï at times. Men on both sides covertly meet in rooms hidden away from the outside world, wearing neatly pressed suits and icy, penetrating expressions. They move in packs, resorting to deception, brute force, and stealth tactics to accomplish remarkably similar objectives. Their latest target is dead-eyed hitman Jef Costello, who after being spotted at the scene of his most recent assassination, inadvertently makes enemies of both sides of the law and finds the tables drastically turning on him.

Perhaps the biggest difference that sets Jef apart from the two factions of equally hostile men coming after him is his crushing isolation, illustrated in the faded grey wallpaper, spartan furniture, and minimalist décor of his single-room Paris apartment. It might almost be the most depressing home one could imagine, if it weren’t for the tiny bullfinch which ceaselessly tweets inside its cage. The personal significance this bird holds for him is never clearly defined – maybe it is a companion of some sort, or a merely an alarm whose ruffled feathers helpfully indicate recent disturbances. Either way, it is the sole shred of life in the flat besides Jef himself, though given the static, 3-minute opening shot of him lying motionless in bed, we can accurately surmise that even he is barely hanging on.

Melville’s 3-minute opening shot sets the scene and tone – Jef lies motionless inside his drab Parisian apartment, adorned with nothing by a birdcage.
Dreary mise-en-scène on every level, from the threadbare mattress to the grey, stained walls.

By necessity of his dangerous profession, meaningful relationships are out of the question. Even more punishing still is the resulting disconnect from his own humanity. Jef’s entire identity seemingly consists of a single, unyielding code, likened to that of the titular Japanese warrior in the fictional quote which opens the film.

“There is no solitude greater than the samurai’s, unless perhaps it be that of a tiger in the jungle.”

Right from this introductory text, Jean-Pierre Melville’s character study promises to be one of exceptionally intensive focus, matching Jef’s pragmatic efficiency with an equivalently methodical narrative and austere visual style. Even outside his drab apartment, this vision of 1960s Paris persists in perpetual gloom, carving out rigid lines from its modernist architecture and lighting its urban scenery with a melancholy blue wash. Such incredible location shooting effectively continues the lineage of Italy’s neorealist cinema, turning the city’s dingy alleys and underground stations into extensions of Jef’s bare bones existence.

Melville’s location shooting puts Le Samouraí in the lineage of neorealism, moving the crime genre to the streets of Paris.

With such little dialogue guiding us through Le Samouraï‘s meticulously winding plot, Melville strips away the innuendos and poetic seductions of his American film noir influences, and frees himself up to advance his narrative through largely visual cues and action. In fact, there is not a single spoken word until about ten minutes into the film, by which time we have already witnessed Jef steal a car, change its number plates, and drive to his lover’s place to set up an alibi for the murder he is about to commit.

Atmospheric lighting and decor in these rooms where police officers and gangster meet – two sides of a coin.

As he continues to traverse these streets of muted colour palettes, he cuts a sharp profile in his beige trench coat and grey fedora, composing himself with stoicism behind rain-glazed windows that conceal any stray hint of emotion. Throughout these stretches of suspenseful silence, François de Roubaix electric organ riffs blend with the acoustic sounds of saxophones, strings, and piano, their propulsive rhythms perfectly complementing Melville’s long takes and riveting narrative pace.

Melville lays the neo-noir atmosphere on thick with the constant rain and muted colour palettes.
Jef wears his fedora and trench coat like a uniform, adhering to a strict set of rules and standards.

Once Jef enters the club which his target owns, his lethal intentions are evident. To get to Martey’s office he must first cross the luxurious lounge, which looks almost futuristic in its polished surfaces and swanky, monochrome designs. Here, wealthy patrons mingle to the sound of a jazz band led by Valérie, who is also the first to spot Jef suspiciously leaving the scene of the crime immediately after the hit. As it turns out, her role in this conspiracy runs much deeper than we suspect, instigating new mysteries when she flat-out denies that he is the culprit during a line-up and saves him from prison. When he later drops by her pristine, white apartment adorned with fine art and posh furniture, we are only left with more questions – how could a bar pianist afford such extravagant living?

Beyond the dirty apartments and streets of Paris, Melville’s sets of upper-class elegance are astonishingly designed, returning multiple times to the monochrome jazz lounge and Valerie’s pristine white apartment.

Many answers are delivered in due course, painstakingly drawn out through Jef’s investigative attempts to ascertain the identity of his boss who ordered the hit, yet even these solutions contain gaping holes within them. Melville’s rigorous focus and camera zooms do their best to pick out details which might bear some significance, but even those are frequently confined to Jef’s limited perspective. Though he notices some shady figures on his tail as he boards a metro train, it remains unclear as to whether they are undercover cops or gangsters looking to take him out. If he is panicking, Delon does not let it show in his calm and steely resolve, seeking to outsmart his foes in the subsequent cat-and-mouse chase which marks one of Le Samouraï‘s most thrilling set pieces.

A gripping set piece in Paris’ underground metro, using the urban terrain as the grounds Melville’s thrilling cat-and-mouse chase.

In fact, there is only one time that we witness a break in Delon’s cool, self-assured demeanour, and he times it for the perfect moment in the film’s final scene. After dispatching the man who originally gave the orders to kill Martey and discovering that he lives in the same apartment as Valérie, Jef approaches the club where she works one last time. He has orders for a new hit, and given the manner in which he puts on his white gloves as per his modus operandi, as well as his sorrowful eye contact with Valérie, his target is clear. This is a man who lives with the honour, pragmatism, and routine of a samurai, unwavering in his discipline, and yet not even that can hold back the mix of emotions that come through in this pained, mournful expression as he raises his gun.

A hint of sadness in Alain Delon’s eyes? The subtlety of his performance is astounding.

It is a shock then that the following gunshots come not from Jef, but rather from elsewhere in the bar, killing him on the spot. Even more surprising is the subsequent reveal of his empty gun barrel. Critics have had no shortage of theories over the decades considering the assassin’s motivations here. Did he realise that the police were closing in, and choose to commit an honourable suicide akin to a samurai’s seppuku? Could it be a romantic gesture, choosing to end his own life rather than go through with Valérie’s murder?

Melville’s ambiguity is purposeful and thought-provoking, but there are at least two certainties we can draw from it – that Jef had accepted that he was going to die, and that he was never going to carry out his final orders. Both mark huge shifts in this character who prides himself on stoic consistency, and yet at the same time the motivations which drive them remain cloaked in complex mystery. Jef may never find total redemption, nor is his death likely to leave much of an impact on the world around him. But in this modern Paris of Le Samouraï which strips its citizens of individuality and assigns them arbitrary loyalties to either side of the law, perhaps this shred of humanity he summons up from deep within his calloused soul is the closest he was ever going to get.

Pulling back into this dispassionate wide shot after Jef’s suicide by cop, leaving only questions behind.

Le Samouraï is currently streaming on The Criterion Channel.

Playtime (1967)

Jacques Tati | 1hr 55min

Playtime opens with a chaotic jazz track of frenzied drums and an electric keyboard against a cloudy sky, though it won’t be until we reach the final act about ninety minutes in that we will come across anything close to this anarchic again. The Paris of Jacques Tati’s slightly futuristic France is a highly curated assortment of rigid lines and boxes, fastidiously fitting workers into cubicles, citizens into apartments, and tourists into buses. His regular silent buffoon, Monsieur Hulot, doesn’t mean to disrupt this tidy, bureaucratic order, but letting a force of innocent curiosity loose in a city of inefficient processes and absurd designs does not bode well for either party.

In real life, the sprawling city set was dubbed Tativille, and pushed Playtime’s budget so far that it claimed the record for the most expensive French film ever produced. This isn’t surprising either – anything less simply would not have satisfied Tati’s extravagant metropolitan vision, built out of large, meticulous set pieces as sharp in their visual design as they are in their social satire.

Tati’s magnificent use of architecture as character rivals Michelangelo Antonioni – the main difference being everything in Playtime is an artificial set, uniting under a singular comedic vision.

By breaking his film up into vignettes that wander from one set piece to the next, Tati keeps a lax approach to traditional plotting, allowing for an organic exploration of his bizarre, monochrome vision of Paris. This is a city of metal and glass, shiny and sleek in its smooth textures, but also completely soulless. The charm of old-fashioned French culture only exists in small glimpses – a street florist contributing a few pops of colour to an otherwise drab sidewalk, and an elusive reflection of the Eiffel Tower in a glass door as it swings open. Everywhere else in this environment of harsh angles and parallel lines, there is barely a curve to be found. For Tati, this is an absolute triumph of set design and architecture, relying on these purely visual elements to tell a story of innocent romance and mindless conformity that dialogue alone cannot convey.

Glimpses of old-fashioned Paris in the street florist and Eiffel Tower reflection, though both are swallowed up by the harsh metallic greys of the city.

It is just as much his immaculate framing of the city as it is his monumental production design which isolates his characters from each other, as there are so many vertical dividers between windows and walls that it is almost impossible for anyone to stand anywhere without being boxed in. His deep focus photography serves well in capturing the breadth and scale of these colossal sets, but it serves a comedic purpose too in the staging of his visual gags, making full use of the frame in all its layers and obstructions. As Hulot sits at the end of an extra-long hallway in an office building, the man he is waiting to meet appears down the other end and begins to make the long journey from the background to the foreground. And then, in awkward silence, we wait some more. Very gradually, the man gets larger, and yet the comically long corridor just keeps on stretching the scene into oblivion.

An impressive commitment to the staging of visual gags, using the full depth of the frame to send up the inefficient layout of the office building.
Wall-length windows become glass boxes, containing Hulot inside rigid, artificial structures and making for some superb displays of set design.

Elsewhere in this office building, Tati confuses a pair of identical doors that lead to very different locations, observes a call operator confuse himself with a switchboard of buttons and dials, and discovers a labyrinth of cubicles ergonomically designed to cut its workers off from all human contact. So much striving for progress has effectively neutered this society’s functionality, to the point that what should be an epicentre of human innovation has become an absurdly convoluted playground. Should one manage to escape from it, as Hulot eventually does, there is no guarantee they will make it back inside the same building – all across this city are identical structures one could easily end up in instead.

A room of grey office cubicles, trapping its workers in claustrophobic boxes and Hulot in a confusing labyrinth.

It is in one of those buildings where Hulot comes across a trade exhibition of various pointless inventions. A broom with headlights attracts a small crowd, and a door that can slam silently is on show too. Perhaps the greatest display though is ‘Thro-Out Greek Style’ which turns ancient Greek columns into flip-top bins, tastelessly commercialising history for cheap profit. If we were to theorise that it is perhaps just this corner of the world that has succumbed to modernity, we are proven wrong when Hulot comes across a series of travel posters advertising famous international destinations, amusingly representing each one with the same dreary city buildings we have already seen here in Paris.

The inventiveness of Tati’s gags are hilarious – ‘Thro-Out Greek Style’.
Travel posters to USA, Hawaii, Mexico, Stockholm, each one represented by the exact same drab building.

“Ultra-modern” is the word citizens proudly use to describe the impersonal style of their architecture and interior design, though there is nothing that looks particularly comfortable about it. Perhaps public buildings can get away with conforming to the same cookie-cutter moulds, but the stacking of identical apartments on top of each other like glass display cases saps the personal lives inside of anything that makes them remotely unique or intimate. Even as Monsieur Hulot enters one of these flats to visit his friend, Tati keeps his camera on the outside, observing the grid of windows from a distance where we can see neighbours going about their own ordinary, unexciting business. At times the camera is positioned in such a manner that we can’t even see the walls dividing the apartments, creating the illusion that their inhabitants are conversing with each other in a unified space. We know better than that though – such a connection between strangers is but a dream in this world of arbitrary barriers.

Apartments designed like display cases, each one as impersonal and generic as the next.
Tati hides the wall between these apartments, and you could swear it looks like these people share a single room. His indictment of modern society’s arbitrary divisions is scathing.

Our only hope that some quaint European charm might live on lies in the converging paths of Monsieur Hulot and Barbara, an American tourist desperately searching for the France of her dreams. As they find each other in a chic, modern restaurant, its geometric and architectural perfection falls to pieces around them, and Tati turns this ordered environment into one of unbridled chaos. It starts small with a floor tile that keeps getting stuck to shoes, revealing a small structural flaw in this room held together by glue, and then the glass door at the front smashes to pieces, forcing a staff member to hold the handle in place and mime opening it for guests. A spiral neon sign on the ceiling leads drunk customers around in circles, pretensions of restraint go out the door when the jazz musicians are replaced by an erratic, impromptu performance, and then, with one swift motion, Tati collapses a ceiling decoration, marking his infrastructure with a higgledy-piggledy arrangement of wooden planks and exposed wires. This uncontrolled mess is the perfect meet-cute for what appears to be the only two people in Paris who long for simpler, scruffier times.

Keeping up appearances after the glass door has shattered, holding the door knob in place for no real purpose.
Chaos erupts across Tati’s mise-en-scène in a tangled mess.

With his slapstick gags and production design carrying so much of the storytelling, Tati’s scripted dialogue remains notably minimal. Rather than functioning to convey detailed information, it simply melds into the sound design where every other aural cue is accentuated. The loud clacking of shoes on hard floors and the constant hum of fluorescent lights tell us just as much about these environments as the nasally drawl of American tourists or the slick sales pitch of a creatively bankrupt entrepreneur.

Of course, cinema is a visual medium though, and Tati recognises it as such in his exacting formal precision, never failing to put his rigorously designed mise-en-scène front and centre. That he can draw out such playful beauty from a society so void of individuality speaks to his craftsmanship as a comedian and filmmaker, especially in the closing minutes where he leads a balletic dance of cars along the city streets, circling roundabouts in never-ending loops and bouncing in time to carousel music. For all its light-hearted social satire, Playtime remains an intricately stacked construction of gags and set pieces, as monumentally ambitious as it is methodically delicate.

Vehicles move like amusement park rides in the final minutes, as Tati turns the city into a carnival set on top of carousel music.

Playtime is currently streaming on SBS On Demand and The Criterion Channel, and is available to rent or buy on iTunes.

The Young Girls of Rochefort (1967)

Jacques Demy | 2hr 5min

In the small French city of Rochefort, seven hours outside Paris, musicians, painters, dancers, and carnies idle around, longing after whimsical dreams they believe will manifest elsewhere. That anyone would want to leave this pastel-coloured paradise seems absurd – where else could one bump into Gene Kelly walking down a pristine street, or have their likeness randomly painted by a mysterious, dreamy stranger? It is telling that the departure of Delphine, a beautiful young dance teacher, also becomes a deadline for her to finally find the man she has been seeking this whole time, and the question of whether the two entwined paths will meet becomes a source of enchanting suspense. Little do these men and women realise how close their romantic ideals are, even as they remain just barely out of sight.

The central predicaments which plague this ensemble of characters seem to be the inverse of those which haunt Lola, the first in Jacques Demy’s Romantic Trilogy, where the ghosts of old lovers trap men and women in wistful, nostalgic memories. The Young Girls of Rochefort possesses some yearning for the past, but it is predominantly towards the bright, hopeful future that our characters direct their attention, as they hang onto pieces of art and music that evoke their creator’s essence. Lola and The Umbrellas of Cherbourg certainly both revel in the exuberance of expressive musical numbers, and yet there is no bittersweet edge present here. Instead, there is a wonderfully formal use of dramatic irony in the multitude of coincidences that keep bringing these sweethearts close enough to touch, only to let them finally collide in marvellously grandiose expressions of love.

The all-white music shop makes for a wonderful set piece several times, but especially in this swooning romantic finale between Gene Kelly and Catherine Deneuve.

The Young Girls of Rochefort opens with what might as well be a musical warm-up for both performers and director alike, as a caravan of carnival trucks arrive in town atop a cable ferry. This slow crossing of the river provides the perfect chance for the travellers to jump out and stretch in synchronicity to the overture, though the actual landing heralds the first major dance number of the film, and an introduction to Rochefort itself – a city where orange trucks, pink fire hydrants, and blue window shutters burst forth in bright urban landscapes, and where vibrantly dressed strangers accompany each other in leaps and twirls down sidewalks with joyous exuberance. Few other filmmakers have proven as thorough an understanding of colour theory as Demy, whose compositions move beyond photographic and into the realm of truly kinetic cinema through the interweaving of choreography and rich production design.

Demy is a perfectionist when it comes to compositions of colour and movement in stunningly choreographed musical numbers.

On top of that, Demy’s camera floats airily through this space, as we witness early on when it lifts up from the town square into the window of a dance and music studio, where our two main characters are finishing up a class. Delphine and Solange Garnier are a pair of twins “born in the sign of Gemini”,an auspicious omen that grounds their very existences in coincidences and good fortune. After observing the fair being set up outside, the two suddenly turn and snap to the camera, and with that sudden shift they launch into the opening musical number as a manner of introduction. The days of songs emerging organically from narratives are gone – like so many other auteurs of the French New Wave, Demy is reinvigorating his chosen genre by acknowledging its artifice, letting his actors directly address the camera as if to invite us into their vivid lives.

Symmetrical framing of the twins who can only be distinguished by their clothing and hair colours.
Simply gorgeous attention to detail in the colours of this city and its inhabitants.

Despite this blatant disregard for movie-musical convention, The Young Girls of Rochefort could not be a more jubilant expression of Demy’s love of the genre. These stylish, vivacious films certainly carry the potential to wrestle with deeper psychological quandaries, and there is even a nod to this sort of darkness here in a jarring subplot regarding a violent murder, but even such tragedies cannot exist without simply being brushed aside as the result of romantic passion gone astray. Heartbreaks only ever belong in the past for these men and women, and second chances are handed out to those who wait with patience. In theory, this hearty belief in the inevitability of destiny takes a good deal of power out of the hands of these characters. But as Demy envisions them onscreen, the lovers who inhabit this small, French town are simply caught up in some remarkable force of romance greater than themselves, inspiring in its artistic expressions of dance, music, and outrageously beautiful colours.

So perfectly curated, everything from the ties to the window shutters.

The Young Girls of Rochefort is available to stream on Stan, Binge, and Foxtel Now.

Point Blank (1967)

John Boorman | 1hr 27min

Point Blank could have almost been a conventional crime thriller in some alternate universe. ‘Almost’ is the key word there, because as much as this film straddles a line between high and low art, John Boorman’s manipulation of pulpy violence and a doggedly determined protagonist points towards something a little sharper and more sophisticated than the material would suggest. With great freedom granted to him in the final cut, Point Blank transcends all genre trappings, as Boorman’s confounding plot and leaps in time extracts a dizzying fever dream from the encounters, deals, and interrogations conducted by one wronged man across the city of Los Angeles.

That this man feels such an urge to correct the injustice committed against him is ridiculous in the first place, given that the money stolen from him had already been stolen from someone else. But Walker is not going to let go of $93,000 that easily, especially since the transgressor is a close friend and associate, Reese, who has additionally left him for dead. Theories that everything after his shooting plays out as a hallucination in his dying mind aren’t totally unfounded, though it is worth noting that even in this first scene we are already disorientated by the cutting between three parallel timelines – his recruitment, the operation, and his half-conscious body lying on the floor of a jail cell, pondering the sequence of events leading to this moment. And then, quietly he wonders to himself…

“Did it happen? A dream… a dream.”

Gorgeous avant-garde framing through mirrors.

Answers don’t come easily here, especially given how obfuscated Walker’s character motivations are. The fuss that he is making over such an inconsequential amount of money in his mission for vengeance doesn’t go unnoted by surrounding characters. “Do you mean to say you’d bring down this immense organisation for a paltry $93,000?” remarks one. “Somebody’s gotta pay,” retorts Walker, though Lee Marvin delivers it as less of a threat and more a weak assertion of justice. In this Californian underbelly, he may have once been an intelligent, fearsome figure, and yet now as he chases up loose ends in an ever-unravelling mystery, he simply looks like an old, lost man, falling back on the only thing he has left – his sheer power of will. Marvin was only 43 years old when he shot this film, but in this role he looks as if he could be anywhere upwards of 50, and so even as he marches forward with steadfast conviction in his quest, there is a weariness contained in his performance, and a frustration by the lack of sense in this unsettling urban landscape.

Superb use of architecture all throughout Point Blank, trapping and isolating Walker in a world of hard lines and angles.

But more than just seeming slightly unnerving, these Californian cities which he traverses are also truly formidable in their magnificent structures, overwhelming and isolating Walker with their off-kilter angles and imposing scale. While a narrative comparison might be able to be drawn to Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo in its surreal, wandering descent, visually Point Blank is closer to a Michelangelo Antonioni film in Boorman’s tremendous use of architecture to divide and obstruct characters in an environment of stone, metal, and glass, rigid in its unified patterns.

Stu Gardner as a demented performer framed in a wide, gaping mouth. Even as Walker beats up two other men, he never stops singing.
Red lighting drips down Walker’s face like blood.

The manner in which these surroundings consume their inhabitants is literalised in one particularly demented scene in a night club, in which an unhinged performer who ad libs over a repetitive guitar riff is introduced to us in the centre of a large, gaping mouth projected upon a screen. In the same scene, right after a violent brawl that sees Walker come out on top, his face is drenched in a red neon light, dripping down his face like bright, bloody rain.

And then as if to sink us even deeper into the psychological chaos of Walker’s mission, Boorman leads us through flashbacks which unfold in dreamy montages and slow-motion. The images just float on by as wistful voiceovers play out over the top, almost like if Terrence Malick were to take a dark turn into experimental neo-noir. The narrative jumps around in non-linear patterns, as a kiss shared between Walker and his sister-in-law, Chris, on the floor of her apartment match cuts to her bed, where they continue to embrace. And quite peculiarly, the confused expression on Walker’s face seems to indicate a similar disorientation to our own, as if a chunk of time between both instances has completely disappeared.

Match cuts forwards and backwards through time, constantly throwing us off.

Indeed, Walker is barely a free agent in this constantly shifting world, and he knows it. As Point Blank reaches its denouement, he chases down a disembodied voice speaking over an intercom system, which may as well be his own self-critical inner monologue even if it sounds like Chris’.

“You’re played out. It’s over. You’re finished. What would you do with the money if you got it? It wasn’t yours in the first place. Why don’t you just lay down and die?”

In the face of such overwhelming odds and with such little justification for his own conviction, what else is there to do? Such a quiet relinquishing of power is the only ending that makes sense for a man so desperate to exert his own will over a world that refuses to bow down. And besides, considering the violent deaths ridden all throughout Point Blank, perhaps Walker’s sad, uneventful retreat into the shadows is the best he could have ever really hoped for.

Point Blank is currently available to stream on The Criterion Channel, and available to rent or buy on iTunes, YouTube, and Google Play.

The Producers (1967)

Mel Brooks | 1hr 28min

Mel Brooks may be a greater writer than he is a director, but there is no holding back in either department when it comes to his film debut, The Producers. He wastes no time in zooming from one plot point to the next like a Marx Brothers routine, and it takes great comedic talents like those of Gene Wilder and Zero Mostel to not just match his brisk pace, but to push it even further. On top of that, The Producers would simply not work if Brooks had anything less than a full ensemble giving it their all in sending up the executives, directors, actors, writers, and even accountants of the musical theatre industry, in all their highly-strung, neurotic quirks.

Brooks’ main and supporting roles take turns playing the fool and the straight man as each scene sees fit, and yet all of their idiosyncrasies are always kept in mind to realise the full comedic potential of each interaction. These are some of Brooks’ best characters, and the groundwork he does in building them up makes for remarkable farcical pay-offs that almost always call back to established running gags and key character traits, from Max Bialystock’s willingness to degrade himself to hysterical lows for money, to Roger De Bris’ vain conviction that self-expression is humanity’s most noble pursuit.

This frenzied opening sequence heightened by manic freeze frames, paired with the opening credits.

Continuing to lift The Producers above many of Brooks’ other directorial efforts is the pure insanity of his editing choices, as he builds the opening credits from freeze frames of Max’s sweaty face in the midst of a playful yet desperate affair with an older woman, trying to extract money from her. Later, Brooks’ set décor vividly complements the lunacy of the characters that inhabit them – the red walls of the restaurant, the blue curtains of the bar, the oranges and whites of Max’s office, and especially the yellow patterned wallpaper of Roger De Bris’ apartment, luridly clashing with the theatre director’s blue, sequinned dress.

Bright, garish production design, always reflecting the insanity of the characters.

Finally, we reach the brazenly offensive musical production, ‘Springtime for Hitler’, complete with pretzel bras and a Busby Berkeley-style dancing swastika. As the camp tastelessness of these artists is revealed in the flamboyant, Nazi regalia, Brooks’ abject, visual artistry fully manifests in all its scandalous glory. And then, just as that reaches its peak, so too does his hilarious send-up of these entitled creators who rip through hallowed topics with reckless abandon, monetising controversy for their own tactless, selfish purposes.

A blend of Nazi regalia and show-stopping Busby Berkeley choreography – the entire ‘Springtime for Hitler’ musical sequence is Brooks at his most comically irreverent, satirising the entertainment industry’s grotesque exploitation of sacrosanct subject matter.

The Producers is available to rent or buy on YouTube.