In some bizarre, self-aware manner, there is an internal logic to the campy sensationalism of Emilia Pérez. Jacques Audiard is unabashedly committed to his ludicrous premise – a ruthless cartel kingpin hires a lawyer to help procure gender-affirming surgery, fake their death, and establish a new life as a woman. It’s the kind of pulpy melodrama one might find in a telenovela, or a Pedro Almodóvar film that revels in its flamboyant queerness. Perhaps the Spanish auteur might have even had the tact to smooth over its wild swings between romance and crime thriller genres, or to polish its tackier elements. Jacques Audiard is certainly no hack, and there is some merit in his outlandish ambition, yet in his hands the tonal misfires present keep this film from ever settling on a coherent direction.
Among Emilia Pérez’s greatest inconsistencies are its musical numbers, vibrantly fusing Latin, pop, and hip-hop styles. At their best, Audiard’s choreography intensifies Rita’s moral conflicts working in law, turning strangers on the street into backup dancers and singers who accompany her internal monologue in ‘El alegato’. There is a music video-like quality to these sequences, featuring high-contrast lighting and dynamic camerawork which match the characters’ heightened emotional realities, while acknowledging darker social issues at play. Mexico’s epidemic of disappearances in particular drives the tension behind the ensemble number ‘Para’, and in the show-stopping ‘El Mal’, Rita’s attack upon wealthy charity benefactors who secretly collude with cartels delivers a sharp, uncomfortable edge.
The foul taste left behind by the outright abysmal musical numbers is harder to reckon with. Pitchy ensemble singers aren’t helped by the jarring placement of songs right in the middle of regular conversations, and awkward lyrics give us clunky gems like “If he’s a wolf, she’ll be a wolf / If he’s the wolf, you’ll be his sheep.” That the low point arrives with the song ‘La Vaginoplastia’ should be no surprise to those who witnessed its ascension to viral scorn, and rightly so. Where most musical numbers serve some sort of emotional expression, it is tough to identify what exactly this is trying to communicate besides the details of gender-affirming surgery. Even this attempt is so inane though that the lyrics might as well be written by school students, skimming through a textbook and listing off whatever terms might suggest they have any idea of what they are talking about.
At the very least, Audiard’s writing of Emilia herself does not flatten her entirely into a one-dimensional transgender cliché, but neither is she a terribly consistent character. The regret she carries from her past as a gangster continues to haunt her, motivating her to start a non-profit which identifies and returns bodies of cartel victims to their families. It is a strange attempt at absolving her of guilt, and one that fizzles out after she begins a relationship with a client. The narrative thread that goes down the path of kidnapping, ransom, and a shootout takes her story in a far more tantalising direction, playing each beat with both total sincerity and thrilling sensationalism. If nothing else, Emilia Pérez swings hard for its camp, gaudy melodrama, and there is something worth admiring in that audaciousness – even if it never quite escapes the awkward inelegance of Audiard’s constant formal blunders.
When a stubborn iconoclast is forced into the rigid confines of celebrity culture, it is inevitable that one will eventually break the other. When that rebel is Bob Dylan and the entertainment industry that he inherits specifically elevates stars with clearly defined images, the friction is enough to instigate a social turning point, confronting the inherent uncertainty within modern art, philosophy, and politics. As such, there is a challenge that comes with fitting his unorthodox story into a genre which often falls too easily into a ‘Greatest Hits’ playlist, appealing more to cheap nostalgia than thoughtful re-examination of an icon’s legacy.
A Complete Unknown is not as boldly experimental asTodd Haynes’ I’m Not There, which offers a far more compelling insight into Dylan’s multitude of identities, yet James Mangold also fortunately saves it from the flavourless banality of Bohemian Rhapsody. Focusing on those first few years of the musician’s career at least grants the film some leeway, catching him at a point in time when the question of who he would be still hangs in the air – though truthfully, this mystery has never quite been settled. Ironically, Dylan’s most distinguishing feature may very well be his elusiveness, and it is there where Mangold’s biopic effectively captures the countercultural icon’s inscrutable essence.
The quiet depth that Timothee Chalamet brings to the role certainly pierces some of that obscurity, offering greater insight into those romantic and professional relationships which shaped his early career, yet never does he completely bare his soul. Not even his girlfriend Sylvie is quite able to figure him out, lamenting the strange gaps in his story that keep others at a distance, but we can also see that he feels just as much an outsider to himself. Instead, music and experimentation pave the path to self-awareness, and as his profile grows, he is quick to defy those who keep him from satiating his curiosity.
Chalamet hits all the right notes here in his interpretation of Dylan, striking a fine resemblance in his recreation of the musician’s drawling mumble, yet also building on his persona in a manner that transcends mere mimicry. This Dylan can be both deeply contemplative and abrasively blunt in his own aloof way, drawing out an affair with singer Joan Baez while continuing to live with Sylvie. Later he walks offstage mid-performance when he feels pressured to sing his most popular songs, and when he introduces his new, electronic sound Newport Folk Festival, he stubbornly persists through the jeers of the audience.
Mangold plays loose with his dramatisation of Dylan’s story, at worst exaggerating the committee’s rush to pull the plug on this pivotal performance, and elsewhere undercutting a breakup scene with an awkward metaphor about spinning plates. After all, a certain level of sensationalism is unfortunately needed in bringing a story like this to the mainstream. For the most part though, A Complete Unknown smooths over these contrivances for the sake of its character work, drawing tension from Dylan’s peculiar, incongruous standing in American pop culture.
The vintage aesthetic that absorbs Chalamet in a world of smoky bars and spotlights also offers some authenticity here, replicating the fashion of 1960s Greenwich Village where bohemian counterculture thrived. With acoustic guitars and soulful vocals filling these spaces too, notes of Inside Llewyn Davis are felt strongly, though Dylan’s tale is not one of existential malaise. Instead, there is an impassioned energy in Mangold’s moving camera and abundant lens flares, blearily underscoring this rise to stardom in an era of artistic revolution.
For the disillusioned audiences of mid-century America, no longer are the glamorous, untouchable idols of Hollywood enough to earn their attention and reverence. News reports of the Cuban Missile Crisis and JFK’s death anchor Mangold’s film to a specific, turbulent point in time, embedding them just as much in Dylan’s character as he is ingrained in the culture at large. The unity of art and politics was not exactly a new concept in the 60s, but to invent a new brand of celebrity that can be both radically outspoken and mysteriously private is a feat which inspires absolute awe in A Complete Unknown. There in the unresolved and unexplained, true artistry is born, and Mangold leaves us entranced by its confounding, extraordinary contradictions.
A Complete Unknown is currently playing in cinemas.
Battleship Potemkin (1925). Eisenstein pioneered the theory of montage in cinema’s early years, emphasising the power of juxtaposition to generate tension, heighten drama, and inspire revolutionary thought in the minds of viewers.
Raging Bull (1980). Schoonmaker has been Martin Scorsese’s editor since the 1960s, building a kinetic energy through pulsating montages, inspired jump cuts, and dynamic narrative rhythms.
Rashomon (1950). Kurosawa’s editing accentuates action and rhythm in his samurai films, emphasising the fluid movement of actors within the frame itself, but his creative accomplishments extend into the broader narrative structures at work as well.
4. George Tomasini
Top 5 Edited Films
Film
Director
Year
1. Psycho
Alfred Hitchcock
1960
2. Vertigo
Alfred Hitchcock
1958
3. Rear Window
Alfred Hitchcock
1954
4. North by Northwest
Alfred Hitchcock
1959
5. The Birds
Alfred Hitchcock
1963
Psycho (1960). Tomasini worked as Hitchcock’s primary editor during his strongest period of filmmaking, building psychological tension through cross-cutting, match cuts, and long stretches of pure visual storytelling.
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (1966). Baragli expertly manipulates time and rhythm in Sergio Leone’s Spaghetti Westerns, generating dynamic suspense in elongated sequences, abrupt cuts, and sharp contrasts between images.
Intolerance (1916). The Father of Modern Cinema and powerhouse couple James and Rose Smith were an editing trio to be reckoned with in Hollywood’s early days, pioneering new techniques in cross-cutting and narrative structure. They invented a cinematic language that is so woven into the art form today, it has become virtually invisible – but it is still evident that they are among the few to have truly mastered it.
Tokyo Story (1953). Unlike so many other editors on this list, Hamamura emphasises lyrical pacing and reflective pauses above propulsive momentum, complementing Yasujirō Ozu’s minimalist storytelling with meditative pillow shots to gently transition between scenes.
The Passion of Joan of Arc (1928). Beaugé’s resume is small, but her top three films display some of the most innovative editing of the silent era, revealing an incredible intuition for sharp visual rhythms and avant-garde experimentations.
9. Michael Kahn
Top 5 Edited Films
Film
Director
Year
1. Raiders of the Lost Ark
Steven Spielberg
1981
2. Saving Private Ryan
Steven Spielberg
1998
3. Schindler’s List
Steven Spielberg
1993
4. Jurassic Park
Steven Spielberg
1993
5. Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
Steven Spielberg
1984
Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981). Kahn demonstrates remarkable consistency across his collaborations with Steven Spielberg, not so much pushing the art form forward with experimental techniques as he is perfecting the art of action and continuity editing, maintaining a visceral sense of adventure.
Requiem for a Dream (2000). Rabinowitz’s achievements are varied across collaborations with several magnificent directors, though he frequently emphasises atmosphere above all else, whether that comes through the disjointed, dreamlike quality of Jim Jarmusch’s deadpan ruminations or Darren Aronofsky’s feverish montages.
Film Editor
Top 3 Edited Films
11. William Chang
1. Chungking Express (1994) 2. In the Mood for Love (2000) 3. The Grandmaster (2013)
When Hungarian-Jewish immigrant László Tóth first arrives in the United States, it is as if we are watching a birth from inside the belly of the steamship itself. The dissonant score of plucked strings and hollow percussion blend with the chaotic din of passengers below deck, scrambling in the darkness to catch sight of their new home. The handheld camera moves in a single, disorienting take with László through the crowd, submerged in total confusion, until finally a glimpse of blinding light pierces through. It takes a few seconds for our eyes to adjust when he exits, but as we gaze up at his beaming smile, we follow his line of sight to New York’s beacon of hope. The Statue of Liberty looms proudly over the tumbling camera, and as Daniel Blumberg’s booming, four-note theme breaks through the raucous sound design with orchestral grandeur, an awe-inspiring vision of the American Dream is announced – albeit one which has been turned totally upside down.
Upon moving to Philadelphia to work for his cousin’s furniture business, still that brassy motif continues to follow László through The Brutalist, welcoming him to a land of freedom and opportunity. There, his expertise as an architect comes in handy when he is hired to renovate a wealthy industrialist’s study into a library. After Mr. Van Buren gets over his initial confusion and outrage, it is also that incredible talent which lands László in the businessman’s inner circle, where he uses his careful craftsmanship to carve a path to prosperity. Still, at no point during their affiliation does László forget that this entire arrangement is founded upon unspoken caveats. As we traverse Brady Corbet’s epic immigrant saga, László’s relationships to both the United States and his homeland are knotted together, yielding complex artistic fusions from bitter nostalgia, soured dreams, and deep-seated cultural trauma.
Corbet opens his film with incredible bravura, tumbling the camera in all directions until finally catching sight of the upside down Statue of Liberty – an outstanding visual metaphor for what’s to come.A saga of American immigrants to join the likes of The Godfather Part II, interrogating all the social and personal struggles that come with this land of freedom and oppression.
The void which The Brutalist fills within modern cinema is one that is only ever occupied these days by films with equal parts mass appeal, artistic ambition, and vintage nostalgia. Right from the moment the word ‘Overture’ appears on a black screen in the opening seconds, it is clear that this is a throwback to the event films of a long-gone era, complete with a lengthy run time and a much-needed intermission. Even Corbet’s decision to shoot on VistaVision, a high-resolution format that fell from popularity in the 1960s, captures that fine, grainy texture and rich colouring of Golden Age Hollywood. With a score that also merges the classical majesty of Maurice Jarre and the avant-garde stylings of Jonny Greenwood, The Brutalist thoughtfully captures László’s split mindset in this country of contradictions, positioning him as an artist caught between the Old World and the New.
Lol Crawley’s talent behind the camera is evident, particularly in his use of VistaVision to capture the scenery’s rich colours and textures.
Of course, that music comparison inevitably draws us to the Paul Thomas Anderson parallels. From The Master’s introspective character study, Corbet borrows a wandering, post-war existentialism, haunted by substance abuse, sexual affairs, and memories of immense suffering. László Tóth is a far more sophisticated man than Freddie Quell, yet both seek some return to normalcy after being separated from their homes and loved ones. On a visual and narrative level though, The Brutalist bears greater resemblance to There Will Be Blood, building a grand mythos around the foundations and evolution of American capitalism. Like oil baron Daniel Plainview, László erects towering monuments of human progress from the raw materials of the earth, and Corbet’s astounding long shots bask in those rugged, monolithic structures rising from the green hills of Pennsylvania.
There Will Be Blood is present in Corbet’s long shots, observing physical manifestations of human progress rise from the earth.
With that said, Plainview does not possess László’s eye for aesthetic and engineer’s mind, making his closest counterpart here the business-minded Mr. Van Buren. The entrepreneur’s bizarre description of their conversations as “intellectually stimulating” and the pedestal he places László upon at opulent dinner parties transcends mere admiration. In his eyes, this immigrant architect is an object of perverse fascination, fetishised for his exotic background, ingenuity, and trauma. Repressed homoerotic attraction and jealousy stoke feelings of insecurity in Van Buren, who finally encounters a barrier that money can’t overcome. As such, the closest he can get to possessing László’s intrinsic gift is through exploiting his labour. This largely comes in the guise of generous benefaction, though when all that charm is stripped away, Corbet reveals a hideous, hateful creature who takes advantage of his subordinate in far more depraved ways as well.
Guy Pearce takes on the character of Van Buren with blazing confidence, masking jealousy and bitterness behind dazzling American charm.
Van Buren easily stands among Guy Pearce’s most compelling characters, played with a roguish allure that draws the respect of similarly powerful allies, but it is Adrien Brody who comes out even stronger in his raw, battered performance as László. He is the culmination of countless devastating experiences, each resulting in unhealthy coping mechanisms that only deepen his psychological wounds. In particular, the heroin that was commonly used to treat pain on the journey to America becomes a toxic habit, frequently used as self-medication. When he attends a club early on to get high, the camera’s energetic swinging at low angles among musicians and dancers eventually gives way to a slow, lifeless zoom in on his glazed-over expression, while the upbeat jazz music nightmarishly dissolves into discordant mayhem.
A prime achievement for Adrien Brody, playing both the soaring strengths and devastating weaknesses of a battered man trying to start a new life away from past traumas.
When László is hard at work on the other hand, Brody projects a supreme, self-composed confidence that seems entirely compartmentalised from his drug-fuelled breakdowns. His genius is limitless under the right conditions, taking physical form in those imposing buildings and interiors which are celebrated in Corbet’s photography. The library especially is a feat of clean, minimalist design, creating a forced perspective from the entry towards a rounded window wall where sunlight filters through translucent white drapes. The bookshelf doors which open in graceful unison make for an elegant touch here too, though it isn’t until Van Buren commissions the architect to construct a community centre that his style evolves into full-fledged brutalism.
Elegance and beauty in the design of Van Buren’s library, often playing host to The Brutalist’s best interior shots.Brutalism as an architectural style is bold, imposing, and honest – a confronting expression of practicality for this artist.
Concrete is a sturdy and cheap material, László reasons, though visually it also makes a powerful statement in its rejection of smooth, polished textures and ornamentations. From this coarse mixture of cement, water, and aggregates, his giant slabs and pillars impose a geometric simplicity upon the rolling countryside, while also expressing a creative, spiritual reverence in the cross that forms from the negative space between two towers. Timelapse photography and metric montages fuse with Blumberg’s driving score as progress is made in the construction, though even beyond László’s creations, Corbet’s camera continues to gaze in wonder at the steep terraces of Italian marble quarries and the vast, steel scaffolding of industrial sites.
The marble quarry in Italy makes for an outstanding set piece, swallowing László and Van Buren up in the gaping caverns of the Earth.Industrial architecture has rarely seemed so stylish, bouncing off the surface of lakes.
After all, don’t those structures which service our basic needs for shelter, security, and community stand at the cornerstone of human civilisation? On a cultural level too, don’t their aesthetic and functionality define entire historical epochs, while also transcending time itself by nature of their permanence? With an immigrant at the centre of this story, Corbet is keenly aware of the irony here – not only was American modernism largely shaped by outsiders importing ideas from Eastern Europe, but those same innovators suffered greatly within the nation’s oppressive economic system.
Being divided cleanly into a rise and fall narrative structure, it is The Brutalist’s second act which especially traces that growing disillusionment, setting László on a steady downward slide. With the arrival of his wife Erzsébet and niece Zsófia as well, it becomes even more apparent just how emotionally stunted he is, keeping him from recovering the stable, loving relationship they shared before the war. Soon, both women join him in recognising the emptiness of America’s promises. “This whole country is rotten,” Erzsébet mournfully laments after his attempt to treat her pain with heroin goes disastrously wrong. At this point, it seems that the only way out is to begin a new chapter of their lives in Israel.
Corbet explores a profoundly troubled relationship between László and Erzsébet in the second act, though here The Brutalist starts to wander.
Unfortunately, it is also this latter half of the film which strays from Corbet’s tight, economical storytelling, stagnating in some plot threads while wandering down others that aren’t so cleanly integrated. As a result, the end of László’s arc comes about abruptly, with nothing but a tonally jarring epilogue to reflect on the legacy he left behind. The monologue here is overly expository, clunkily revealing layers to his artistry which link back to his experiences as a Holocaust survivor, and it is incredibly disappointing that our first proper viewing of the finished community centre comes through fuzzy video tape footage.
Instead, the most impactful conclusion to The Brutalist arrives at the end of Part 2. Corbet’s handheld camerawork and long takes have consistently imbued this epic with a primitive intimacy, and now as Erzsébet confronts Van Buren in front of his friends, both are used in a single, tremendous shot lasting several minutes. All at once, the polite civility which has long maintained the systemic injustice he has profited off crumbles, exposing a cowardly, insecure man who is nothing without the respect of his peers. Where László’s legacy is substantial and far-reaching, the haunting ambiguity of Van Buren’s own fate appropriately transforms him into a ghost of sorts, intangibly bound to that magnificent community centre and the talented architect who designed it. Such is the nature of a culture which purposefully imbalances the relationship between investor and creator though, and as this sprawling, historic fable so vividly expresses, it is often the latter who bears the true cost of progress.
What unfolds behind the closed doors of the Sistine Chapel in the wake of a pope’s death is an esoteric mystery for the public, and a tantalising source of intrigue in Conclave. Those untouchable pillars of virtue who make up the College of Cardinals represent one of the most powerful patriarchies in the world, yet only a fool would believe they are above the messiness of material, bureaucratic machinations. Especially when the time comes for them to decide the future of the Catholic Church, factions solidify into cliques, demanding unwavering loyalty amid profuse uncertainty. The only death that takes place in Conclave is the late Pope’s, and the film’s sole action set piece is merely a footnote within the broader narrative, but the tension that Edward Berger weaves into this historic landmark is rich with all the conspiratorial speculation of an exhilarating political thriller.
Ralph Fiennes’ performance as Dean Thomas Lawrence must also be credited for anchoring this sacred assembly in a weary apprehension, both disillusioned by the church and anxious that its leadership should fall into the wrong hands. With Berger’s camera frequently circling him and hanging on the back of his head in tracking shots, we are placed right in his uneasy state of mind, aggravated further by the deep, staccato strings restlessly driving each scene forward. It seems cruel that he should be the man to preside over the papal conclave given his personal troubles, but still he remains true to his duty. This is a process heavily entrenched in ritual and tradition, and there can be no allowance for unorthodox interferences at any point – so when the candidates themselves are caught up in self-aggrandising games of sabotage, to whom can their followers turn for spiritual guidance?
Fiennes is weary, anxious, and subdued as he takes on the responsibility of leading the papal conclave, worry lines creasing his forehead.
Thoughtfully adapted from Robert Harris’ novel, Conclave possesses a screenplay that is more concerned with archetypes than characters, both to its benefit and detriment. These cardinals stand for opposing sides of an internal conflict more than their specific doctrines, vaguely labelled here as reactionaries, moderates, and liberals with little regard to what these practically mean. On one hand, this broadly helps to shape the story into a microcosm of modern politics, rendering their philosophies as secondary to their trivial antagonism. On the other, it struggles to distinguish these characters beyond their shallow alliances, each equally obstinate in their goal to elect whoever best serves their own interests.
Precision, order, and tradition in Berger’s visuals, from his blocking of large crowds to their resplendent garments.
While Conclave does not engage deeply with Lawrence’s particular crisis of faith either, it at least positions his perspective as perhaps the most compelling of this religious debate. “Certainty is the great enemy of unity. Certainty is the deadly enemy of tolerance,” he preaches in his homily before the first vote, encouraging his peers to vote for someone who recognises doubt as a great virtue. After all, it is from that space between two absolutes that faith is born – not that many in his audience are ready to listen with open hearts. This is nothing more than his own personal ambition speaking, they believe, coming across as an attempt to throw his name into the ring.
On some subconscious level, perhaps there is some truth to this as well. Along with Lawrence’s spiritual turmoil, he must also grapple with his own opportunistic tendencies, driving him to step forward when he realises his friend Aldo Bellini cannot lead the church’s progressive faction to victory. As such, the universe’s timely intervention at the exact moment he casts a vote in his name almost seems to be a biblical rebuke from the heavens, humbling him before a righteous, divine God who has a plan for all things.
Uncanny timing in what seems to be an act of God, rebuking Lawrence for committing the sin of pride.
Lawrence is far from the only ego present forced to face his sin though. The secrets that simmer beneath the surface of the papal conclave hold the potential to topple candidacies, and as they are gradually brought to light, each one also exposes the moral weaknesses of those religious leaders who hide behind facades of reverence. Whether they concern long-buried mistakes from thirty years ago or recent acts of deep-seated corruption, the humiliation that comes with their revelation brings prideful men to heel, begging the question of who can really be trusted with such consequential responsibilities.
A tremendous use of architecture and colour, letting the red of the cardinals’ robes pop against white colonnades.Another visual highlight as the cardinals make their way in unison through the rain beneath white umbrellas, finally coming to a majority decision on their next pope.
That Berger brings such solemn gravity to his staging of this confined drama only deepens the burden upon these characters’ shoulders as well, seeing him constantly underscore the sharp angles and perfect symmetry of the Vatican’s Renaissance architecture. Beautiful marble interiors, plazas, and colonnades host crowds of cardinals in their black and red attire, collectively moving in uniform patterns around the Apostolic Palace and the Domus Sanctae Marthae, and forming a particularly striking composition as they head towards their final vote beneath white umbrellas. Even as they wait around between votes, Berger turns yellow and red plaster walls into striking backdrops for their idle smoking and texting, while inside he casts the eyes of history upon them through montages of the Sistine Chapel’s vibrant frescoes.
The weight of history bears down on the cardinals from the Sistine Chapel above.Colour and texture in Berger’s use of these walls as striking backdrops.
This is evidently an environment bound by precise order, and the fact that Berger took liberties to make the cardinals’ living quarters even more prison-like than real life only further emphasises its severity. As a result, when this rigidity is compromised to even a minor extent, we can feel the full weight of its implications. This particularly comes into play when we consider the role of women in Conclave who are relegated to minor and supporting roles, much like in the church itself, yet who bear incredible influence upon the formal proceedings. Isabella Rossellini’s stern, authoritative turn as Sister Agnes stands out here even in her limited screen time, balancing her devotion to the church against her desire to see unworthy candidates held accountable, and eventually allying with Lawrence to see the Lord’s will be done.
A small but standout performance from Rossellini, reassessing the role that women play in the church.
With this consideration of gender roles in mind, the final secret revealed in Conclave makes for a particularly earth-shattering subversion of the Catholic Church’s dogmatic power structure, treading a narrow line between stringent dichotomies. If the lead-up to it were not so hinged on a contrived, idealistic plot device that overrides all the political game-playing we have witnessed, Berger might have stuck the landing even more, but the resolution nonetheless gives tangible meaning to Lawrence’s acceptance of a life without certainty. As this entire process has demonstrated, an institution that is focused on tradition more than the future is damned to fall on its own sword, blinded by a strict adherence to icons loaded with influence and stripped of moral substance. In Conclave, these icons do not necessarily need to be demolished – it is the periodic reinvention of what they stand for which grants longevity to the fundamental principles of their diverse, devoted followers.
Many of cinema’s great screenwriters frequently worked in partnerships or teams, and so in the interest of giving credit where it is due, the names of their key collaborators have been listed as co-writers. The main exception is if co-writers have had strong careers independent of each other, in which case they are listed here separately.
The Seventh Seal (1957). Bergman weaves poetic reflections and savage verbal sparring through profound examinations of our relationship with God, ourselves, and each other – all equally marked by existential spiritual turmoil.
Double Indemnity (1944). Wilder proved he could do it all, from fatalistic film noirs to biting satire, each thrumming along with razor-sharp wit. In all his best screenplays though, he also understands his characters’ desires and weaknesses on an intimate level, building these into his narratives with incredible economy.
Annie Hall (1977). Allen’s neurotic humour delivered a shock to the comedy genre in the 1970s, examining romantic and moral complexities with an intellectual yet self-deprecating tone.
Fargo (1996). Dark, deadpan humour, eccentric characters, and an absurd sense of fatalism define the Coen Brothers as a writing duo, revelling in the chaotic unpredictability of life and the poor souls caught up in it.
5. Quentin Tarantino
Top 5 Screenplays
Film
Year
1. Pulp Fiction
1994
2. Reservoir Dogs
1992
3. Inglourious Basterds
2009
4. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
2019
5. Django Unchained
2012
Pulp Fiction (1994). Tarantino is widely recognised as one of cinema’s great masters of dialogue, and this is certainly true – but he is not up this high either without his masterful non-linear storytelling and genre subversions.
Taxi Driver (1976). Schrader has written some of cinema’s greatest character studies, revealing the inner lives of morally compromised antiheroes on paths to redemption, or alternatively destruction.
The Godfather (1972). Coppola’s greatest narratives are grand, operatic fables with richly layered characters, often exploring the subtle madness which underlies their power and ambition.
There Will Be Blood (2007). There is an intricate, psychological depth to Anderson’s writing, often possessing a dark humour which underscores his explorations of surrogate families, obsessive ambition, and distorted power dynamics,
9. Stanley Kubrick
Co-writers: Terry Southern
Top 5 Screenplays
Year
Film
1. Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb
Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964). Kubrick approaches his writing with the same intellectual rigour and ironic detachment as his meticulous direction, aiming a critical tone at frail societal constructs and their relationship to humanity’s darkest impulses.
Rashomon (1950). Forces of honour and corruption fight for their own forms of moral justice in Kurosawa’s deeply cynical parables, often using Japanese history as a rich cultural backdrop, and carrying a Shakespearean gravitas even when he isn’t directly adapting the Bard himself.
15. Ben Hecht Co-writers: Charles Lederer, W.R. Burnett, John Lee Mahin, Seton I. Miller, Charles MacArthur, Samson Raphaelson, Arthur Laurents, Walter Newman, Lewis Meltzer
Locomotive driver Lantier has been painfully afflicted by the consequences of his ancestors’ alcoholism since birth, though the way it manifests as headaches and uncontrollable fits of rage in La Bête Humaine, it might as well be a blood curse. When he is caught in the throes of passion or intoxication, he appears to be possessed by some invisible force, at one point compelling him to wrap his hands around the neck of his sweetheart Flore before a passing train snaps him back to reality. As such, it is a dangerous game that his newest love interest Séverine is playing, slyly luring the angry, volatile beast from out of its cage and setting it on her abusive husband.
The link between France’s poetic realism and Hollywood’s films noir is evident in Jean Renoir’s bleak, psychological tale, laying out the blueprints of those corrupted antiheroes and femme fatales who would dominate the next decade of American cinema. That La Bête Humaine’s roots extend back to the naturalistic writing of novelist Émile Zola only further embeds it within a history of fatalistic storytelling as well, rejecting romanticism in favour of moral ambiguity and melancholic contemplations on the inexorable nature of man. After all, Lantier’s downfall is woven into the very fabric of his character, dooming him to a tragic fate decided before he was even born – so who better to navigate his dance with darkness than the French master of camera movement?
An uncontrollable fit of rage tempered by a passing train – these high-momentum vehicles are deeply linked to Lantier’s soul.Window frames divide the frame into segments, placing a barrier between the camera and the actors.
Coming off a string of cinematic triumphs, the versatility of Renoir’s fluid visual style was well-established in 1938, though here it is more precisely aimed at generating a pervasive, uneasy tension. This is not to say his camerawork isn’t swept away by romance on occasion, even falling under Séverine’s allure in one ballroom scene as it lightly weaves its way among dancers to find her, but far more notable is the chilly distance which it keeps between us and the actors. When fate guides Lantier to the train where his path will soon collide with Séverine’s, we are kept on the outside, only catching glimpses through the windows as we drift past. Moreover, the murder she conducts with her jealous husband Roubaud unfolds entirely out of view, just behind the closed doors of a private compartment. Her wealthy godfather Grandmorin is the target here for allegedly assaulting her in the past, though given Roubaud’s abusive nature, his own future isn’t looking terribly secure either.
Renoir’s camera niftily traverses the ballroom, joining the waltzing dancers to eventually find Séverine.An excellent introduction to this fateful train ride, tracking the camera outside the windows as Lantier wanders between compartments.Doors closed and shutters down – we remain at a distance outside the train as Séverine and Roubaud commit murder.
With an infatuated Lantier as the sole witness to this assassination, Séverine finds no difficulty in covering it up, and thus an affair begins to blossom between the two. Renoir’s camera seems to be in equal adoration of her as well, often framing her through windows and mirrors like the subject of a painter’s gaze, though he does not shy away from the darkness which encompasses both in sultry, gloomy reflections. While Jean Gabin is playing out internal battles of self-control and impulsive fury, Simone Simon delivers a similarly layered performance as Séverine, albeit one which conceals a sharp, manipulative mind beneath seductive pleas for Lantier’s masculine protection. When she eventually confesses her love to him one rainy night, the camera’s movement from their kiss to an overflowing, nearby barrel isn’t just a suggestive hint at the following consummation – it is an ominous symbol of mounting emotions ready to spill over at any moment.
Séverine is one of cinema’s original femme fatales, delicately captured in this sultry, gloomy reflection.Elegant framing through mirrors in the mise-en-scène.Camera movement ties this romantic affair to an overflowing barrel – an ominous visual metaphor.
The first attempt on Roubaud’s life thus stands out as perhaps the most potent harbinger of film noir in La Bête Humaine, both in terms of narrative and mise-en-scène. With Séverine’s murder of Grandmorin becoming a point of morbid intrigue for Lantier, she takes him to a murky, industrial train yard where can find out for himself what it is like to kill a man, and Renoir’s lighting grows more expressionistic than ever. Long shadows are thrown across the rough ground, and a single strip of light illuminates Lantier’s guilty eyes, before he reaches down into a puddle and claims a steel pipe as his weapon. Even with Séverine’s encouragement though, still he cannot bring himself to unleash the murderous animal within him – at least, not upon the target she has aimed him towards.
A single strip of light illuminates Lantier’s guilty eyes, revealing an expressionist influence.A dark reflection of Lantier as he picks up a murder weapon, tipped upside-down in this black puddle.A precursor to film noir in the high contrast lighting of this train yard, mirroring the darkness of Lantier’s character arc.
Like the steam trains he is so lovingly obsessed with, Lantier cannot deviate from the rigid tracks he has been set on, and it is no use trying to slow or control him. Renoir has been building this metaphor right from the start through montages of chugging wheels, burning furnaces, and our soot-covered protagonist at the helm, while those recurring shots fixed to the vehicle itself build a similarly brisk momentum, hurtling forward into pitch-black tunnels and beneath bridges. His fate is as tragically assured as the destination of any locomotive, finally toppling headfirst into madness when Séverine tries to seduce him one last time into killing her husband.
Marvellous montage editing upon the train as it hurtles through tunnels, beneath bridges, and past fields – an unstoppable force of destiny.
Much like the murder of Grandmorin, Renoir’s camera keeps a safe distance from the violence which unfolds, though this time we are given glimpses through a doorway as Lantier furiously chases his lover. With so much of this unfolding offscreen, we are given nothing but her chilling screams to fill in the dead air before he finally re-enters the frame, pushes her onto a bed, and sinks a knife into her flesh. In the aftermath, the sentimental lyrics of a French love song seem to taunt Lantier as his mind begins to clear, and the camera drifts mournfully across Séverine’s limp, lifeless body.
“Whoever tries to love Ninette,
Will end up with a broken heart,
Ninon’s little heart,
Is tiny and frail and adorable.”
A subtle but powerful reframing of the camera as the murder commences within this narrow doorframe, disappears from view, and then reemerges from another angle.The camera drifts in close-up along Séverine’s lifeless body as the sentimental lyrics of a French love song taunt Lantier in the background.Finally pushed to the edge and consumed by corruption, shadows fall harshly across Lantier’s face.
Still set on a singular, unwavering path, Lantier trudges down the railway tracks and towards his final shift at work. The beast within him has won, and now only death can end the suffering it has inflicted upon his mind and soul. After witnessing him jump from a moving train and finding his body in the grass, it seems that even his colleague Pecqeaux agrees too, poignantly remarking that “I haven’t seen him look so peaceful in a long time.” Perhaps this calmness found in the destruction of the self is the best that any of us can hope for, Renoir cynically laments – and yet La Bête Humaine never entirely discounts the grace which comes with such suffering. If anything, the fact that Lantier’s anguish resonates so loudly only affirms the existence of beauty in his troubled life, letting us cherish it even more for its delicate, fateful fragility.
Peace is found in death – the total destruction of self.
La Bête Humaine is currently streaming on The Criterion Channel.